This graph shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, making comparisons where relevant.
The provided graph illustrates the percentage of four various
materials
that were recycled between 1982 and 2010 in a distinct nation. The essay describes the main features and compares the information.
Overall
, the recycling rate of all materials
increased in the period of time. From them, the Aluminium can's amount of recycling was the highest rather than all other products.
With regards to paper and cardboard, the recycling rate of the portion was over 60% in 1982, then
the trend fluctuated from 70% in 1986 to 65% in 1990. After that, the path increased to 80% in 1994 then
it gradually fell to 70% in 2010. Meanwhile, the recycling trajectory of glass containers dropped from 50% in 1982 to 40% in 1990. After Effects, this
trend rose again gently at 60% in 2010.
On the other hand
, Aluminium cans recycling was the prominent direction which increased significantly. In 1986, the rate of these materials
was lower than 10 per cent then
the percentage of the material materials
percentage climbed up sharply to above 20% in 2002, and the tendency again rose rapidly to above 40% in 2010. Finally
, the portion of recycling plastic materials
inclines slowly over the time period.Submitted by jonahid.stu20ju on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Conclusion: The conclusion is too long.
Vocabulary: Replace the words materials with synonyms.
▼
Vocabulary: The word "percentage" was used 3 times.
▼
Vocabulary: The word "trend" was used 2 times.
▼
Vocabulary: The word "increased" was used 3 times.
▼