This graph shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, making comparisons where relevant.

The provided graph illustrates the percentage of four various

materials

Use synonyms

that were recycled between 1982 and 2010 in a distinct nation. The essay describes the main features and compares the information.

Overall

Linking Words

, the recycling rate of all

materials

Use synonyms

increased in the period of time. From them, the Aluminium can's amount of recycling was the highest rather than all other products. With regards to paper and cardboard, the recycling rate of the portion was over 60% in 1982,

then

Linking Words

the trend fluctuated from 70% in 1986 to 65% in 1990. After that, the path increased to 80% in 1994

then

Linking Words

it gradually fell to 70% in 2010. Meanwhile, the recycling trajectory of glass containers dropped from 50% in 1982 to 40% in 1990. After Effects,

this

Linking Words

trend rose again gently at 60% in 2010.

On the other hand

Linking Words

, Aluminium cans recycling was the prominent direction which increased significantly. In 1986, the rate of these

materials

Use synonyms

was lower than 10 per cent

then

Linking Words

the percentage of the material

materials

Use synonyms

percentage climbed up sharply to above 20% in 2002, and the tendency again rose rapidly to above 40% in 2010.

Finally

Linking Words

, the portion of recycling plastic

materials

Use synonyms

inclines slowly over the time period.