Some people think that the government is responsible for looking after the elderly. Others believe that it should be family members. Who do you think should take responsibility?

It is often said by some human beings that old

people

should be managed by the government,

while

others believe that it is mandatory that family should take care of them. In my opinion, the latter proportion appears to be more rational.

This

essay will highlight the both above-mentioned views in the upcoming paragraphs with proper explanation

thus

will lead to a logical Conclusion. On the

one

hand, if the government does not focus on the elderly population, it will impact their lives. To elucidate it, it is mandatory that the government should provide support to

people

, aged above 65, whether it can be psychological or financial. A pension system,

for example

, should be introduced so that

people

cannot depend on others to fulfil their basic requirements ( clothes and medicine).

As a result

,

this

amendment represents a breeding ground for improving their quality of life. Moving towards the latter notion, some individuals opine that family is the basic need for an aged person, as members of a family share a great bond with each other. To be more precise, the family is the

one

, to better understand the needs of their family member. To epitome, if any member of the family is suffering from depression

then

other members of the family provide psychological support by encouraging the depressed

one

to vent his or her feelings.

Hence

, aged families will surely get care from the

people

with whom they are surrounded. In conclusion,

although

the authority will surely help the aged

one

by providing finances.

However

, the physical and psychological needs are only fulfilled by the individuals nearer to them.