Some feel that governments should prioritize healthcare instead of other important areas. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Many people are inclined to believe that the government ought to place healthcare above other crucial sectors. I partially agree with

this

viewpoint inasmuch as prioritizing the healthcare industry can not only increase life expectancy and reduce its costs

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

but simultaneously cause underdevelopment in other areas.

To begin

with, there are many obvious advantages. The first benefit is connected with reducing mortality. If

health

protection is given more attention as opposed to other spheres, it can improve quality of life and

health

outcomes,

such

as in many dangerous surgeries,

thus

increasing the life expectancy of the population. Another major positive side is that costs for many medical procedures and doctor’s examinations will be reduced. To be more specific, it will be really advantageous for poor families as they will be able to afford them and, correspondingly, their well-being will be improved. Despite these advantages, there are

also

a variety of distinct drawbacks, and a major one is that it can lead to many adverse effects in other spheres, especially the education system and technology

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

because the government will not allocate funds equally for each sector and will place

health

maintenance above others.

As a result

, it may

also

lead to a decline in the quality of services in these sectors. In conclusion, from my perspective,

although

prioritizing

health

protection over other areas can reduce mortality and the costs of pills and surgeons, it can

also

cause some problems in other spheres.

Therefore

, I partially agree with

this

statement.