Some people think that building tall building is the best way to create more housing space, while other people believe it's better to build many houses on land. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Nowadays, a lot of

people

are debating about the best structure of buildings, some think that the taller it is, the more

people

it could accommodate. Whilst other contradict

this

idea and believe that

houses

are better on land to create recreational

space

around their

houses

.

This

essay will discuss both viewpoints and provide a concluding view. On the one hand, some individuals support the idea that

houses

should be built on land because

this

may give them the option to create landscapes around the house that will serve as their relaxing spot.

This

includes gardens and furniture where they can sit outside and have a cup of tea.

This

can be seen in villages in many countries, where most of their homes were built with

such

areas for aesthetic and greenery purposes, even though

this

leaves limited

space

for the house itself.

Although

this

is ideal for

people

who are busy at their work and could utilise

this

place to unwind, the price of

this

type of structure is usually cost-prohibitive for many.

On the other hand

, problems with properties have arisen these past few years. Despite being prone to calamities, proponents of skyscrapers said that these types of buildings will accommodate more individuals and families.

For example

, more and more high-rise apartments are sold in the metropolitan area of Melbourne, Australia

due to

the increasing number of foreigners residing in the country. To accommodate them, the government laid out a plan to demolish public

houses

on land to construct tall apartments to solve

this

crisis.

Along with

this

, they are now using advanced engineering,

such

as springs for the building to withstand earthquakes. In my opinion,

this

outweighs the disadvantages of

this

side. In conclusion,

people

argue about building the structure of

houses

, one side believes a recreational

space

for owners is essential even though

this

equates to limited

space

for their house. It appears to me that high-rise buildings are the most a more efficient way to solve the growing population of various countries, especially if the challenge of natural calamities could be prevented.