some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. others argue that it is better to try and imporve such situations. discuss both these views and give your own opinion

It has long been a topic of discussion whether

people

ought to be easygoing amid adversities like insufficient personal funds or undesirable employment or ,

instead

they must display resistance by ignoring the

conditions

that are unfavourable. Undoubtedly, each side has its own merits and demerits to discuss and my own thoughts are

also

gravitating towards the second option. First of all, life is never equally fair to everyone,

therefore

, some

people

have to encounter difficulties more often than others. Some

people

are prone to give in amid financial or social predicaments earlier than others and I believe

this

tendency deprives them of changing their

conditions

from less desirable to desirable. As a vivid example of

this

, some

people

think that it is an idle effort to remedy the existing

conditions

but rather accept them as they are , since the universe is balanced and what is meant to happen, will happen.

On the other hand

, proponents of the second idea argue that humans have the capability to defend their position in life by showing unparalleled persistence.

Furthermore

, others, myself included, argue that if you are taking charge of life, you will be able to favourable circumstances.

Moreover

,

people

should realize that there is a solution for everything; if you can show ample stubbornness, excellence is unavoidable.

For example

, I have personally been promoted two times in a row

this

year owing to my sheer will

while

the

conditions

were hostile.

To sum up

,

although

complying with harsh

conditions

is an option, I believe,

people

should challenge the odds and emerge victorious. Even though it is a pretty challenging task to pull off, it is feasible to achieve through patience and perseverance.