With traffic jams and pollution increasing every year in big cities, some people say that public transport should be free in big cities to help reduce these problems which are caused by cars. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

I strongly, agree that public
transport
should be free in big
cities
which can help in reducing
pollution
because most
pollution
is caused
due to
cars. Nowadays, in big ,
cities
pollution
is increasing day by day, which is affecting
people
's health
as well as
living standards. In big
cities
is fully polluted by noise
pollution
, land
pollution
, air
pollution
and water
pollution
. Free public
transport
will
also
reduce the number of cars and even
traffic
jams
.
For example
, in a city like
,
Remove the comma
apply
show examples
Mumbai if the government provides free
transport
then
most of the
people
will prefer to use free
transport
facilities which will help to reduce
pollution
problems
and even health
problems
.
Pollution
is increasing every year in big
cities
.
Traffic
jams
is
Change the verb form
are
show examples
creating so many
problems
like groups having to leave early for work because of
traffic
jams
. Students are facing
problems
in going to the school. There are so many benefits of providing free
transport
to the public. Free public
transport
will be
also
good for poor
people
.
For example
, if the nation provides facilities of trains for free
then
the problem of
traffic
will be automatically solved.
Thus
, free
transport
will help to reduce
traffic
jams
.
However
, free
transport
have
Change the verb form
has
show examples
so many benefits
as well as
advantages so the government should make
transport
free but
this
will even affect
on
Change preposition
apply
show examples
people
who are engaged in taxis service.
To conclude
, the above information provides a suggestion that providing free
transport
facilities will help big
cities
in so many ways.
Hence
, I strongly, agree that public
transport
should be free in big
cities
so it will help reduce the
traffic
jam problem which is
due to
more and more cars.
Submitted by purvaam383 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task response
The essay demonstrates a good understanding of the prompt and makes a clear argument. The writer should ensure to address all aspects of the task prompt and provide a more balanced view, considering both the advantages and disadvantages of free public transport in big cities.
coherence and cohesion
The logical structure is generally sound, with clear progression from introduction to conclusion. However, there is a need for stronger transition and cohesive devices to enhance coherence.
lexical resource
The essay displays a satisfactory range of vocabulary, but there is room for improvement through the use of more precise and varied expressions. Additionally, some terminology related to pollution and public transportation can be included to enhance lexical resource.
grammatical range
The essay contains a variety of complex structures, but there are instances of grammatical errors and awkward phrasing. More attention should be given to sentence structures for accuracy and fluency.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • urban congestion
  • pollution
  • public transport
  • incentive
  • behavioural change
  • implementation
  • alternative solutions
  • sustainable
  • environmentally friendly
  • infrastructure
  • commuter
  • accessibility
  • efficiency
  • subsidize
  • carbon footprint
  • mitigate
  • feasibility
What to do next:
Look at other essays: