With traffic jams and pollution increasing every year in big cities, some people say that public transport should be free in big cities to help reduce these problems which are caused by cars. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
I strongly, agree that public
transport
should be free in big cities
which can help in reducing pollution
because most pollution
is caused due to
cars.
Nowadays, in big ,cities
pollution
is increasing day by day, which is affecting people
's health as well as
living standards. In big cities
is fully polluted by noise pollution
, land pollution
, air pollution
and water pollution
. Free public transport
will also
reduce the number of cars and even traffic
jams
. For example
, in a city like ,
Mumbai if the government provides free Remove the comma
apply
transport
then
most of the people
will prefer to use free transport
facilities which will help to reduce pollution
problems
and even health problems
. Pollution
is increasing every year in big cities
.
Traffic
jams
is
creating so many Change the verb form
are
problems
like groups having to leave early for work because of traffic
jams
. Students are facing problems
in going to the school. There are so many benefits of providing free transport
to the public. Free public transport
will be also
good for poor people
. For example
, if the nation provides facilities of trains for free then
the problem of traffic
will be automatically solved. Thus
, free transport
will help to reduce traffic
jams
. However
, free transport
have
so many benefits Change the verb form
has
as well as
advantages so the government should make transport
free but this
will even affect on
Change preposition
apply
people
who are engaged in taxis service.
To conclude
, the above information provides a suggestion that providing free transport
facilities will help big cities
in so many ways. Hence
, I strongly, agree that public transport
should be free in big cities
so it will help reduce the traffic
jam problem which is due to
more and more cars.Submitted by purvaam383 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task response
The essay demonstrates a good understanding of the prompt and makes a clear argument. The writer should ensure to address all aspects of the task prompt and provide a more balanced view, considering both the advantages and disadvantages of free public transport in big cities.
coherence and cohesion
The logical structure is generally sound, with clear progression from introduction to conclusion. However, there is a need for stronger transition and cohesive devices to enhance coherence.
lexical resource
The essay displays a satisfactory range of vocabulary, but there is room for improvement through the use of more precise and varied expressions. Additionally, some terminology related to pollution and public transportation can be included to enhance lexical resource.
grammatical range
The essay contains a variety of complex structures, but there are instances of grammatical errors and awkward phrasing. More attention should be given to sentence structures for accuracy and fluency.