Proponents argue that government expenses on repairing historical places should be halted, and that amount must be used in the construction of the city
opponents disagree with the above point. In my view of thinking, the restoration of ancestral buildings which are the unique identity of our cities is a necessary step for any regime.
, these places help to earn money for councils through tourism.
with, every town in the world consists of distinct architectural houses from centuries. These symbols not only are the pride of locals but
preserve their historical moments.
spending on road and housing development can be helpful to citizens, the refurbishment of old buildings is required to teach the generations about the past of our city.
, my nephew always asks me about the story of the Holkar family after he sees the Holkar Palace in my village.
, on the one hand, spending on city development like streets, lights, or homes does not provide any sort of income to councils
on the other hand
, well-maintained historical places generate great revenue for the government.
, the bloom in the travelling industry can help local businesses to grow.
, the increasing number of visitors makes the region popular in the world.
, 82% of cities in India are spending one-third of their budget on restoring historical palaces, and in return, these attractions are giving hefty revenue through tourism.
, the maintenance of old architecture is a recommended step for the rulers of any region around the globe
the fact that
houses hold the history of their surroundings, and a good amount of money,
as well as
popularity, can be gained through the well-structured buildings from an old era.