The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000, 2005 and 2010 about one university. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The supplied illustration gives information about observations in various

years

in one university.

Overall

, almost all aspects of a university have an improvement in each year, on the

contrary

Add the comma(s)

,contrary

show examples

the range of modules offered declined every period in the table. As can be seen, teaching quality had a small decrease from 65 per

cent

in 2000 to 63 in 2005, but despite

this

factor after five

years

Add a comma

,years

show examples

measurement had risen like never before. The print resources had a percentage of over 80% every time period. Meanwhile, electronic resources rocketed from 45 per

cent

in 2000 to 72 per

cent

in 2005, and

then

climbed to 88 per

cent

after 5

years

.

However

, the modules that were offered by the university were 32 in 2000,

then

slightly fell to 30,

after

this

in 2010 percentage declined again to 27. At the same time number of buildings or facilities that was used for teaching remained constant over the period and accounted for 77 per

cent

of all 10

years

.