Countries with a long average working time are more economically successful than those countries which do not have a long working time. To what extent do you agree or disagree.

Many people argue that long average working hours bring more profits to the countries than those which have lower

time

. Personally, I partly agree with

this

view and it depends on the monetary and physical health of workers. On the one hand, the more

time

you

work

, the more money you make.

Therefore

, if citizens earn more money from their hard

work

, the government will receive more revenue from taxes leading to the development of the

economy

. To illustrate, many present companies pay salaries to employees based on their dedication and productivity.

Hence

, it is easier for staff who

work

for a long period and have high productivity to be promoted on the career ladder and dedicated to society by paying taxes.

On the other hand

, I believe that not always spending a long

time

at

work

contributes more to the money in the

economy

than those who do not. One reason is that some health problems may appear

due to

long-term assignments.

Thus

, their productivity will decrease and badly affect their income.

For example

, in Japan, many people who are old and vulnerable to

the

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

diseases

such

as stress and strain are working like blue-collar workers in some fields.

Consequently

, many research showed that the rate of loneliness and isolation in them

higher

Add a missing verb

is higher

show examples

than in many countries of the world, resulting in the reduction of the labour force and profits of the

economy

. In conclusion, for the reasons I have mentioned above, I believe that

although

long labour

time

can help the

economy

of the countries earn higher revenue, it is not a good way to improve the monetary because of the potential harm to the residents.