The media is increasing interest in famous people who have ordinary backgrounds. Why do you think people are interested in the lives of famous people? Do you think this is a good thing?

A significant number of people hold the perception that the magazine has the power to publish thorough information about an individual's assertion,

nevertheless

, another school of thought

also

share the sentiment that

this

trend should be mitigated.

This

essay will totally endorse the former view,

however

, the two opposing sentiments will be discussed in the following paragraphs after which a logical conclusion will be drawn. On the one hand, when the media exposes mankind info, it can put lives in danger. To elaborate, a young man in my neighbourhood was beaten to death because of a bad comment he made.

This

trend occurred

as a result

of the press exposing

such

comments

as well as

his background. If

such

a phenomenon continues,

then

individuals will lose trust in the media. Admittedly, exposure to folk's data will put people in their early graves.

On the other hand

, it is blatant that mankind becomes famous when newspapers showcase thorough information about the populace. To explicate, Twene Jonas used to be an ordinary person but after he started addressing issues concerning Ghanaian citizens and the writer posting it on their various platforms, he became well-known. Despite the fact that humans can be famous, the background of the citizens can not be put in danger.

By contrast

, there are a myriad of ways one can be a celebrity

such

as helping the needy.

For example

, research conducted by non organization two years ago revealed that sixty per cent of people end up being famous when supporting the needy. In conclusion, after examining the two contradictory views, I strongly believe that human lives will be at risk when exposed and

therefore

, it should be stopped. In view of

this

, I recommend that the press should come out with different ways of posting one's data.