Some people think that the best way to reduce time spent in travelling to work is to replace parks and gardens close to the city centre with apartment buildings for commuters, but others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion

Some

people

believe that the most effective solution to shorten the commuting time to

offices

is to transform

parks

and

gardens

near the

city

center

Change the spelling

centre

show examples

into housing complexes for workers,

while

others maintain the opposite point of view.

This

essay will discuss both perspectives

while

also

offering an explanation as to why the former argument promotes better conditions for workers. On one hand, converting

city

parks

and

gardens

into residential buildings will expedite the

people

's movement to the business district.

This

is because a lot more

people

live closer to their

offices

, preventing them from getting stuck in traffic jams or crowded public transportation. In big cities in developing countries, public transportation facilities are poor, forcing

people

to use cars or motorcycles that cause road congestion during rush hours.

Such

a circumstance can be addressed by adding more housing complexes in the

city

centre.

On the other hand

,

people

demand the provision of open spaces like

parks

and

gardens

to facilitate leisure activities in the

city

. Green area plays a pivotal role as

the

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

meeting point, picnic destination, and even sports areas easily accessible to the public.

For instance

, Central Park in New York has been regarded as the model of a

city

park as it serves various functions for New Yorkers. Its strategic location has attracted many visitors escaping from the concrete jungle. Many

people

who live in the cities have seen the benefits of

parks

and

gardens

for their lives.

Nonetheless

, I personally believe that more residential areas should be built in the centre even at the expense of eliminating

parks

and

gardens

because its benefits outweigh the cost of retaining green areas. Closer distance to

offices

means that the use of cars or vehicles run on fossil fuels will be less, reducing pollution.

Consequently

, more energy can be saved, contributing to the fight against climate change. It is indeed true that having more trees growing in the

city

centres can help absorb the produced carbon dioxide.

However

, reducing its production brings more advantages

while

at the same time increasing the efficiency of workers' journey to the

offices

.