Some people think charity organizations should help people in great need wherever they live. However, others think they should help people in their own country. Discuss both opinions and give your own idea.
In the interconnected world, the range of charitable assistance be it within their
country
as opposed to spreading kindness worldwide is a matter of debate. While
there are several compelling arguments on the former point of view, I do believe that they should try their utmost to help the disadvantaged wherever they reside.
On the one hand, there is convincing evidence for the rationality of charity
organizations
offering help to those residing in their own country
. First and foremost, doing charity
in their own country
saves a significant amount of money, which otherwise
would be spent on things like long-distance transportation and communication with foreign organizations
and governments. Additionally
, charity
organizations
hold more specific and accurate information on the data of their native country
. Attributing to these two major factors, there will be a minimum waste of resources if charities are done in the country
where the organization is. What’s more, from the organizer’s perspective, they have the obligation and responsibility to assist those who share the same society and even ancestral origin. As a result
, their action would likely contribute to the strengthening of national cohesion, and create a supportive and harmonious atmosphere within the nation, which is beneficial for these receivers, donors and society as a whole.
Nonetheless
, the arguments in support of helping people
worldwide are much stronger than those of only donating in their own country
. To begin
with, in this
unbalanced world where different countries are in completely different phases of development, some underdeveloped areas may lack adequate money to carry out charitable activities locally, thus
requiring aid from better-developed countries. If all charity
entities focus solely on their nation, the gap between their development would keep widening and trigger disputes and conflicts within the human race. Moreover
, from a humanitarian perspective, charity
organizations
should also
look upon and help residents across the world with equal dedication and devotion since disasters cannot tell national borders, striking people
of all countries and nations. For instance
, natural disasters such
as earthquakes and pandemics would affect all people
on the planet equally without cooperation across all nations.
In conclusion, I can understand the reason why some groups prefer restricting their assistance within their national border, but I would argue that it is more reasonable and consistent with the humanitarian spirit to offer help to the
Correct article usage
apply
people
in dire need irrespective of their nationalities and origins.Submitted by 52YANGYANG on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
coherence cohesion
Ensure that the introduction and conclusion clearly state your opinion on the matter.
task achievement
Provide more specific examples and evidence to support your arguments.
lexical resource
Vary your vocabulary and use more advanced and precise words and phrases.
grammatical range
Pay attention to sentence structure and eliminate any grammatical errors.
Word Count
IELTS says that you should write a minimum of 250 words in writing task 2. If you go under word count you will lose marks in task response.
A very long essay will not give you a higher band score.
Aim for between 260 to 290 words in writing task 2. This will ensure a concise essay and will be realistic in terms of time management. You have only 40 minutes to write the essay and you need around 10 minutes of planning time, so you will not be able to write a long essay in 30 minutes.