Some people think charity organizations should help people in great need wherever they live. However, others think they should help people in their own country. Discuss both opinions and give your own idea.

In the interconnected world, the range of charitable assistance be it within their

country

as opposed to spreading kindness worldwide is a matter of debate.

While

there are several compelling arguments on the former point of view, I do believe that they should try their utmost to help the disadvantaged wherever they reside. On the one hand, there is convincing evidence for the rationality of

charity

organizations

offering help to those residing in their own

country

. First and foremost, doing

charity

in their own

country

saves a significant amount of money, which

otherwise

would be spent on things like long-distance transportation and communication with foreign

organizations

and governments.

Additionally

,

charity

organizations

hold more specific and accurate information on the data of their native

country

. Attributing to these two major factors, there will be a minimum waste of resources if charities are done in the

country

where the organization is. What’s more, from the organizer’s perspective, they have the obligation and responsibility to assist those who share the same society and even ancestral origin.

As a result

, their action would likely contribute to the strengthening of national cohesion, and create a supportive and harmonious atmosphere within the nation, which is beneficial for these receivers, donors and society as a whole.

Nonetheless

, the arguments in support of helping

people

worldwide are much stronger than those of only donating in their own

country

.

To begin

with, in

this

unbalanced world where different countries are in completely different phases of development, some underdeveloped areas may lack adequate money to carry out charitable activities locally,

thus

requiring aid from better-developed countries. If all

charity

entities focus solely on their nation, the gap between their development would keep widening and trigger disputes and conflicts within the human race.

Moreover

, from a humanitarian perspective,

charity

organizations

should

also

look upon and help residents across the world with equal dedication and devotion since disasters cannot tell national borders, striking

people

of all countries and nations.

For instance

, natural disasters

such

as earthquakes and pandemics would affect all

people

on the planet equally without cooperation across all nations. In conclusion, I can understand the reason why some groups prefer restricting their assistance within their national border, but I would argue that it is more reasonable and consistent with the humanitarian spirit to offer help to

the

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

people

in dire need irrespective of their nationalities and origins.