With the increasing demand for energy sources of oil and gas, people should look for sources of oil and gas in remote and untouched places. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages of damaging such areas?

In

this

day and age,

energy

is a hotly debated topic that often divides opinion. Some

people

argue that we should seek

sources

of fossil fuel in remote and untouched areas to solve

energy

problems,

while

others agree that

this

phenomenon can result in several drawbacks for both humans and nature. From my perspective, I am convinced by the latter argument, and

this

essay will shed light on the rationale. On the one hand, seeking new

sources

of

oil

and

gas

can provide a solution to the global

energy

shortage. Fossil fuels,

such

as

oil

and

gas

, enable the heating of homes, operation of vehicles, and electricity generation, all of which play an important role in the development of humankind. Coal mines and natural

gas

deposits are not infinite, and with the evolution of the human industry, some current natural resources,

such

as oilfields in Qatar, are under threat of running out in recent years.

Therefore

, it is necessary for

people

to seek new

sources

of fossil fuel in remote areas to address

this

global issue.

In addition

, exploiting fossil fuels in new

places

contributes to economic growth in some countries.

Such

activities are projected to create more job opportunities for residents in the mining industry,

such

as miners, managers, and engineers.

Consequently

, it will help millions of

people

escape poverty, expand the middle class, and make some countries' economies more powerful.

On the other hand

, despite

these

Correct determiner usage

the

show examples

merits of finding new

sources

of

oil

and

gas

, the disadvantages in

this

situation seem to be more crucial for the sustainable development of humankind. Clearly, destroying natural habitats

as well as

seeking new fossil fuel

sources

could be regarded as the two major disadvantages. From a biological perspective, using untouched

places

to produce

oil

and

gas

can have a detrimental effect on ecological balance.

This

is because some rare species are likely to live in remote and untouched areas. If we destroy these

places

to produce

oil

and

gas

, it can result in extinction.

Moreover

, the process of exploitation produces carbon emissions and contributes to the global warming phenomenon. The extraction process will significantly reduce global greenery, leading to fewer trees available to process the increasing amount of carbon emissions. In conclusion, the disadvantages of looking for

sources

of

oil

and

gas

in

places

that have not been reclaimed, leading to global warming and ecological imbalance, seem to outweigh the economic growth benefits. I believe that

people

should explore alternative solutions,

such

as renewable

energy

, to address

energy

issues.