Occasionally, in job interviews individuals are asked about their personal life. A group of people believe that
this
data is useful and can be related to the required position. Linking Words
However
, another group thinks the opposite. I completely agree with the second group.
Some employers suppose that asking personal questions will help them decide whether the job seeker is suitable for the role or not. Hobbies, interests, and marital status are examples of Linking Words
this
type of personal information that may help employers select the right person. Linking Words
For example
, someone who likes reading books might be suitable for a librarian or bookstore seller rather than one who watches TV in his spare time. Another useful knowledge is marital status. Factors Linking Words
such
as the possibility of working overtime or having family responsibilities can be important depending on the position.
Linking Words
On the other hand
, the second point of view talks about how personal information should not affect the hiring process. There are more important criteria Linking Words
such
as university education, relevant certifications and, work experience. Linking Words
While
recruitment, these criteria should be considered, not private information. There are many people whose private lives are completely different from their personalities at work, so Linking Words
this
knowledge cannot accurately help employers. Linking Words
Lastly
, all individuals should have equal opportunities for job positions apart from their personal lives and Linking Words
finally
be selected Linking Words
according to
their merits.
In conclusion, I believe everyone should compete equally for a role and should be chosen based on more serious criteria like academic study or expertise.Linking Words
sahebe.jalali