Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

The general public has a multitude of views about the funding of creative
artists
.
While
some people think that the
government
should not financially support
artists
as they do not directly contribute to society, I believe that there are strong and significant reasons why funding of
art
projects should come from both the
government
and the
artists
themselves. On one hand, some
art
projects without a doubt require help from the state. In European countries
such
as Italy and France, there are a lot of artworks in public spaces,
such
as streets or squares in city
centers
Change the spelling
centres
show examples
. These artworks represent culture, heritage and history, which in turn serve to educate people about the city
,
Remove the comma
apply
show examples
and act as landmarks or talking points for visitors and tourists. The cultural implication behind those
artwork
Fix the agreement mistake
artworks
show examples
can
also
increase the cohesion among citizens and
thus
enhance their sense of belonging to the country. Governments and local councils should
therefore
pay creative
artists
to produce
this
kind of
art
,
Remove the comma
apply
show examples
because without their funding our cities would be much less captivating and attractive.
On the other hand
, I can certainly understand the arguments against
government
funding for
art
. The main reason for
this
view is that governments have more important concerns. An example is that
state
Correct article usage
the state
show examples
budgets need to be spent on education, healthcare, infrastructure and security, among other areas. These public services are vital for a country to function properly,
whereas
the work of creative
artists
, even in public places, is a luxury.
According to
Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs, physiological and safety needs always take precedence over elements of higher hierarchy, like the sense of belonging. If basic needs like healthcare services and national security cannot be fulfilled, it is pointless to sponsor
artists
even if their artworks can help increase the sense of belonging of citizens. Another point to note is that
government’s
Correct article usage
the government’s
show examples
funding comes from
tax
Fix the agreement mistake
taxes
show examples
paid by citizens and the funding should be used to implement policies which can benefit the majority.
Artists
are only the minority in society so the general public may deem it unfair that the
government
uses part of their hard-earned money to sponsor something that they may not be able to
be benefited
Wrong verb form
benefit
show examples
from. Under
this
line of thinking, there are justifiable reasons why
artists
should rely on alternative sources of financial support, but
government
help is
also
sometimes necessary as it helps enrich a country’s culture.
Submitted by jothyliu on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

introduction conclusion present
Your introduction is missing, which is crucial for setting the stage of your essay. An explicit introduction helps to guide your reader and establish your position on the topic.
supported main points
You have presented some main points, but they need further development and support. Always ensure that your arguments are well-explained and include a range of specific, relevant examples.
complete response
Your response partially addresses the task. However, you didn't discuss fully both views and your own opinion is not clearly stated. Make sure your position is consistently maintained throughout the essay and the prompt is fully addressed.
clear comprehensive ideas
Your essay includes ideas but they can sometimes be more comprehensive with wider explanations and more detailed arguments. Aim for depth in your treatment of the topic.
relevant specific examples
You've provided examples, but they are not always relevant or specific enough. Try to include more detailed examples that directly support your viewpoint or the argument you are discussing.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: