Some employers put more emphasis on practical skills than theoretical knowledge. Others insist that candidates have an academic background or formal qualifications. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
In the realm of employment, a perennial debate revolves around the emphasis placed on practical
skills
versus theoretical knowledge. While
some employers prioritize candidates with hands-on experience
and practical skills
, others insist on academic backgrounds and formal qualifications
. This
essay will explore both perspectives and offer a balanced view on
the importance of practical Change preposition
of
skills
and theoretical knowledge in the professional landscape.
On one hand, proponents of practical skills
argue that real-world experience
is a more reliable indicator of an individual's capabilities in a professional setting. They contend that candidates with practical skills
have a tangible understanding of the challenges and nuances of the job, making them more adept at handling tasks efficiently. From this
perspective, hands-on experience
is seen as an immediate asset, enabling individuals to seamlessly integrate into the work environment without a steep learning curve.
On the other hand
, there is a cohort of employers who place significant importance on academic backgrounds and formal qualifications
. They argue that a solid theoretical foundation equips individuals with a broader understanding of concepts, critical thinking abilities, and the capacity to adapt to diverse situations. Academic qualifications
are often considered as evidence of discipline, perseverance, and the ability to grasp complex ideas, which are vital attributes in various professional fields.
In conclusion, the debate surrounding the emphasis on practical skills
versus theoretical knowledge reflects the diversity of opinions in the professional sphere. Both perspectives have their merits, and a harmonious integration of practical experience
and academic qualifications
is likely to yield the most competent and versatile professionals. Employers should recognize the value of this
synergy to ensure a workforce that is
not only skilled but also
well-equipped to navigate the complexities of today's dynamic job market.Submitted by pedrothedawn on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Coherence Cohesion
Your essay provides a clear structure, with well-differentiated paragraphs and logical sequencing of ideas
which enhances its readability. Maintain this logical structuring in future essays.
Coherence Cohesion
You have effectively included both an introduction and a conclusion, each serving its purpose well. Ensure
that the conclusion effectively summarizes your key points and reinforces your overall stance on the topic.
Coherence Cohesion
The main points of the essay are supported by explanations; however, you could enhance
these with more detailed examples. Providing concrete examples can fortify your arguments and give more clarity.
Task Achievement
The essay addresses the task prompt, but could be further improved by a more defined
and pronounced personal opinion, especially towards the end of the essay. This makes your stance clearer to the reader.
Task Achievement
The ideas are clear and comprehensive, but strive to provide deeper insights into the topic.
Aim to explore the implications or reasons behind the preference for practical skills or theoretical knowledge.
Task Achievement
Specific examples pertaining to industries, job roles, or real-life scenarios
where practical skills or theoretical knowledge are preferred would strengthen your essay. This will make your argument more persuasive and impactful.
Fully explain your ideas
To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).
For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:
- Paragraph 1 - Introduction
- Sentence 1 - Background statement
- Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
- Sentence 3 - Thesis
- Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
- Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
- Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
- Sentence 2 - Example
- Sentence 3 - Discussion
- Sentence 4 - Conclusion
- Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
- Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
- Sentence 2 - Example
- Sentence 3 - Discussion
- Sentence 4 - Conclusion
- Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
- Sentence 1 - Summary
- Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
- Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation
Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.