The government should impose a fee on drivers who use their vehicles during rush hour to help cut down on air pollution from exhaust fumes. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

There is no denying the fact that imposing a fee on drivers can be an arguable subject.
While
it is a commonly held belief that some individuals believe that to help cut down on
air
pollution
from exhaust fumes government should impose a fee on drivers. there is
also
an argument that opposes it. In my opinion, I consider that there are better solutions than
fees
one of them is to build transportation to help reduce the usage of cars.
To begin
with, Imposing a rush hour fee will have economic and social implications.
In other words
, it can be helpful , especially for low-income individuals who may depend on their cars for work.
In addition
, it will be useful to explore alternative solutions to
air
pollution
apart from
fees
.
For example
,
such
as encouraging public transportation, carpooling, and promoting electric vehicles. Another point to consider is that technological innovations nowadays can impact traffic congestion. It is
also
possible to say that, by using technology we can build smart traffic management systems, to alleviate traffic without additional
fees
.
Moreover
, government investment in infrastructure
support
Change the verb form
supports
show examples
the reduction of
air
pollution
.
For instance
, it can contribute to reducing individual car use during peak times. In conclusion, despite people having different views, I believe that I tend to believe that
fees
on drivers are not the only solution to face
air
pollution
and congestion, I suggest that the government make programs that help in building infrastructure that reduces the issue.
Submitted by abdelaah.12 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

coherence cohesion
Ensure that paragraphs have clear central topics and use a range of cohesive devices to enhance the flow of the essay.
task achievement
Develop paragraphs fully with specific examples and support. Each main point should be elaborated with sufficient detail.

Use a variety of complex and simple sentences

You should use complex sentences in your writing, but it does not mean that you should try to make all of our sentences complex.

‘Complex’ sentences are not actually very complex; they are just two or more simple sentences put together. Putting them together makes the essay more coherent and cohesive.

Examples:

I really want to study but I’m too tired.

I wore a warm coat because the weather was cold.

If action is not taken soon on climate change, global warming will get worse.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • Congestion charging
  • Emissions
  • Air quality
  • Public transportation
  • Carpooling
  • Infrastructure
  • Economic impact
  • Social equity
  • Smart traffic management
  • Peak times
  • Technological innovation
  • Subsidies
  • Exemptions
  • Urban planning
  • Sustainable commuting
  • Environmental policy
  • Automotive dependence
  • Traffic volume
  • Rush hour
What to do next:
Look at other essays: