The government should impose a fee on drivers who use their vehicles during rush hour to help cut down on air pollution from exhaust fumes. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

There is no denying the fact that imposing a fee on drivers can be an arguable subject.

While

it is a commonly held belief that some individuals believe that to help cut down on

air

pollution

from exhaust fumes government should impose a fee on drivers. there is

also

an argument that opposes it. In my opinion, I consider that there are better solutions than

fees

one of them is to build transportation to help reduce the usage of cars.

To begin

with, Imposing a rush hour fee will have economic and social implications.

In other words

, it can be helpful , especially for low-income individuals who may depend on their cars for work.

In addition

, it will be useful to explore alternative solutions to

air

pollution

apart from

fees

.

For example

,

such

as encouraging public transportation, carpooling, and promoting electric vehicles. Another point to consider is that technological innovations nowadays can impact traffic congestion. It is

also

possible to say that, by using technology we can build smart traffic management systems, to alleviate traffic without additional

fees

.

Moreover

, government investment in infrastructure

support

Change the verb form

supports

show examples

the reduction of

air

pollution

.

For instance

, it can contribute to reducing individual car use during peak times. In conclusion, despite people having different views, I believe that I tend to believe that

fees

on drivers are not the only solution to face

air

pollution

and congestion, I suggest that the government make programs that help in building infrastructure that reduces the issue.