Some people say that drug companies have a responsibility to spend money on researching medicines that will help people in poorer countries. Others say the main responsibility of drug companies is to make money. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

The debate over whether
drug
companies
should prioritize financial gains or allocate resources for the development of
medicines
for impoverished
nations
is gaining increasing prominence. In navigating
this
complex issue, my thesis posits that
while
drug
companies
must prioritize profitability to sustain their business, they should
also
earmark a portion of their resources for the betterment of healthcare in underprivileged countries.
This
essay will elaborate on the humanitarian need for research aimed at poorer
nations
as well as
the capitalist perspective that underscores the importance of profitability. The notion that
drug
companies
have a responsibility to spend money on researching
medicines
for impoverished
nations
stems from a humanitarian angle. For one,
such
an approach serves the greater good by ensuring that crucial
medicines
reach those who are most vulnerable and
otherwise
overlooked.
For instance
, the development of affordable antimalarial drugs has a direct and profound impact on African
nations
where malaria is endemic. In doing so,
drug
companies
not only gain social capital but
also
expand their market reach, creating a win-win scenario for both parties. On the flip side, the argument that the core responsibility of
drug
companies
is to make money is based on capitalist principles. In a free-market economy, the primary duty of any company is towards its shareholders. Research and development (R&D) require enormous financial investment, and there is no guarantee of the commercial viability of a new
drug
.
Therefore
, focusing on diseases prevalent in wealthier
nations
, where consumers can afford expensive treatments, ensures a better return on investment.
This
enables
companies
to sustain their R&D pipelines, leading to the innovation of new
medicines
in the long run.
To sum up
, the essay has explored the dual expectations placed upon
drug
companies
: the humanitarian imperative to focus on healthcare needs in impoverished countries and the business necessity to generate profits.
This
intricate balance aligns closely with the question statement, affirming that
drug
companies
can indeed harmonize their profit-making objectives with their social responsibilities.
Submitted by ashissarker18 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

coherence cohesion
Ensure a logical flow between all sections of the essay, including between the introduction, body paragraphs, and the conclusion. Transitions could be further enhanced for seamless integration of ideas.
coherence cohesion
Sustain the clarity throughout the essay by ensuring each paragraph focuses on a single main idea with coherent support. Avoid overgeneralization by providing specific examples wherever possible.
task achievement
Address the task directly throughout the essay by responding to all parts of the prompt with a balanced view. Inclusion of specific examples to support the arguments will enhance the task response score. Avoid general statements that do not directly relate to the prompt.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • corporate social responsibility
  • sustainability
  • innovate
  • profitable
  • humanitarian
  • financial health
  • incentivizing
  • neglected diseases
  • ethical implications
  • exclusive rights
  • accessible
  • navigate challenges
What to do next:
Look at other essays: