Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree?

The population of the current world tend to think differently on a debit how beneficial the rail line and harbour

systemsare

Correct your spelling

systems

systems are

. A small number of groups think that ministries invest their budget in rail lines

instead

of harbours. I firmly agree with

this

opinion. In the following parts, I will try to explain why I am a supporter of

this

argument. First of all, transportation is the biggest issue so as to the lands ;

Therefore

, Many various vehicles have been established. The category of tracks belongs to subways, trains and trams

as well as

category of wharves includes trumps, buses and cars. The railway tools are more enviromentalist

due to

the use of electricity

nonetheless

the means of roads utilize fuel oil

along with

diesel oil which is harmful to the sky. It is the air pollution that will make our breath worse.

As a consequence

, we can analyse it in some areas which are crowded and have a big problem with jams. South Korea is a commonly known sample of

this

situation since they use cars more than undergrounds so they have had grey sky for years

furthermore

they do not listen to the suggestions of experts .

On the other hand

, Tracks are useful for trading. Especially the authorities which have important ports, fields and areas, emphasise how important a good infrastructure is for growing so as to the authorities.

In addition

, many years ago the trains functioned with charcoals

together with

it was the reason for air pollution nowadays it seems to

lose

Wrong verb form

have lost

show examples

this

position. In conclusion, rail lines can flatly be seen to be better than wharves.

Thereafter

governments try to work about that railways must cover all lands suitable for transport because of the reasons described afore.