Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods. Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
A number of people believe that productions and markets have the liability to cut back on the proportion of wrappers of products
while
Linking Words
many others contend that buyers should decrease buying items with more packaging.
While
Linking Words
both viewpoints are valid, I lean towards the latter. There are convincing reasons why some opine that fabrications and retail outlets should diminish the parcel of goods.
Firstly
Linking Words
, minimizing bundles can have positive effects on the habitat,
such
Linking Words
as reducing pollution. The habit of using plastic bags to store food increases the amount of waste because they are not sustainable products that we can reuse.
As a result
Linking Words
, when the parcel is thrown away, it may cause environmental damage
such
Linking Words
as air, water, and soil pollution. Reducing packaging can support
this
Linking Words
waste.
Secondly
Linking Words
, lessening bundles can help construction be more thrifty resources.
This
Linking Words
is because wrappers are made from abundant natural resources
such
Linking Words
as wood, oil, or paper. Dwindling sacks can allow
protect
Change the verb form
protecting
show examples
these valuable resources.
However
Linking Words
, I would argue that customers should avoid buying products with a lot of pouches. Despite the fact that a box or carton can prevent goods from being damaged during transit, too much can cause natural issues.
Thereupon
Linking Words
, consumers should revoke
pick
Wrong verb form
picking
show examples
up that kind of commodities to show their attention to the milieu. By rejecting an unessential sack,
such
Linking Words
as a plastic bag or gift box, purchasing eco-friendly wares or recycling or reusing to diminish the amount of waste. Environmental protection is everyone’s obligation, not only the obligation of the creation but
also
Linking Words
the client. In order to achieve a balance between creation and client, the government should implement policies and launch campaigns to increase awareness and work toward sustainable development goals. In conclusion,
although
Linking Words
both views are valid to some extent, I still opine that each single person should have the blame
to rescue
Change preposition
for rescuing
show examples
the ecosystems. By cooperating together, we can recover the ecology and build a more long-lasting future.
Submitted by huoglan10 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

coherence cohesion
Ensure all ideas follow a logical order and paragraphs are well-developed around a central topic. Improve the logical flow with better use of cohesive devices.
task achievement
Address all parts of the task equally, giving balanced consideration to both viewpoints before presenting a clear position. Provide a detailed argument for your own view.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • Sustainability
  • Eco-friendly
  • Carbon footprint
  • Excessive packaging
  • Biodegradable materials
  • Corporate social responsibility
  • Consumer advocacy
  • Environmental stewardship
  • Waste reduction
  • Recycling initiatives
  • Green practices
  • Minimalist lifestyle
  • Resource conservation
  • Sustainable consumption
  • Packaging alternatives
  • Regulatory measures
  • Ethical choices
  • Environmental impact assessment
  • Renewable resources
  • Compostable packaging
What to do next:
Look at other essays: