Some people feel that manufacturers and supermarkets have the responsibility to reduce the amount of packaging of goods. Others argue that customers should avoid buying goods with a lot of packaging. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
A number of people believe that productions and markets have the liability to cut back on the proportion of wrappers of products
while
many others contend that buyers should decrease buying items with more packaging. While
both viewpoints are valid, I lean towards the latter.
There are convincing reasons why some opine that fabrications and retail outlets should diminish the parcel of goods. Firstly
, minimizing bundles can have positive effects on the habitat, such
as reducing pollution. The habit of using plastic bags to store food increases the amount of waste because they are not sustainable products that we can reuse. As a result
, when the parcel is thrown away, it may cause environmental damage such
as air, water, and soil pollution. Reducing packaging can support this
waste. Secondly
, lessening bundles can help construction be more thrifty resources. This
is because wrappers are made from abundant natural resources such
as wood, oil, or paper. Dwindling sacks can allow protect
these valuable resources.
Change the verb form
protecting
However
, I would argue that customers should avoid buying products with a lot of pouches. Despite the fact that a box or carton can prevent goods from being damaged during transit, too much can cause natural issues. Thereupon
, consumers should revoke pick
up that kind of commodities to show their attention to the milieu. By rejecting an unessential sack, Wrong verb form
picking
such
as a plastic bag or gift box, purchasing eco-friendly wares or recycling or reusing to diminish the amount of waste. Environmental protection is everyone’s obligation, not only the obligation of the creation but also
the client. In order to achieve a balance between creation and client, the government should implement policies and launch campaigns to increase awareness and work toward sustainable development goals.
In conclusion, although
both views are valid to some extent, I still opine that each single person should have the blame to rescue
the ecosystems. By cooperating together, we can recover the ecology and build a more long-lasting future.Change preposition
for rescuing
Submitted by huoglan10 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
coherence cohesion
Ensure all ideas follow a logical order and paragraphs are well-developed around a central topic. Improve the logical flow with better use of cohesive devices.
task achievement
Address all parts of the task equally, giving balanced consideration to both viewpoints before presenting a clear position. Provide a detailed argument for your own view.
Essentional vocabulary list for IELTS Writing 7+
Learn how to write high-scoring essays with powerful words.Download Free PDF and start improving you writing skills today!