In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
One
of the most controversial issues today relates to the municipal budgets spent on railways. While
some people
argue that governments should spend large amounts of money on establishing new railway
lines
, others support the idea that the financial funds should be used for the promotion of current public transport
. I consider that we should both establish new lines
and promote existing transport
.
On the one
hand, there are various reasons why it is essential to spend budgets on new railway
lines
. The primary reason is that setting up more railway
lines
will be considerably conducive to the development of the economy of certain cities. This
is because these lines
make it possible for people
to travel from one
city to another and thus
improve the economic communication between cities. Subsequently
, establishing these new lines
can reduce the use of other environmentally harmful vehicles since they have no harmful effect on the environment. For example
, people
from one
city are more likely to take the train rather than drive a car to another, which reduces exhaust gas emissions to some degree. Therefore
, building new lines
is both beneficial for economic development and environmental protection.
On the other hand
, I agree that it is also
crucial for authorities to allocate their funds to the promotion of current public transport
. Firstly
, there is a large demand for improving their subway and bus, since people
take these public transports every day. For instance
, most of the residents in the city take the subway or bus to work or study and thus
these facilities need to be promoted to satisfy local citizens' basic needs. Secondly
, developing current public transport
is also
a good way to solve social issues, like traffic congestion. To take an example, with a better public transport
system, more citizens probably will take the subway or bus and thus
there will be fewer private cars on the street, which helps reduce the possibility of traffic congestion.
In conclusion, I believe that governments should not only use their budgets on constructing new railway
lines
,
but Remove the comma
apply
also
spend them on promoting current public transport
.Submitted by 609553855 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
coherence cohesion
Ensure each paragraph has a clear central idea, which is expanded upon with supporting details. This essay presents a logical flow of arguments, which enhances readability and understanding.
coherence cohesion
The introduction and conclusion are clear and relevant, effectively setting the stage and summarizing the essay's viewpoint.
coherence cohesion
Main points are well-developed with adequate support. However, for an even stronger score, provide more specific examples and data if possible, to substantiate your claims further.
task achievement
The task has been responded to effectively with both sides of the argument presented and the writer's opinion clear. For an even better score, ensure that your opinion is not only stated but also thoroughly justified throughout the essay.
task achievement
Ideas are clear, comprehensive, and well-debated throughout the essay. To further enhance clarity, try to explicitly connect the discussion back to the main question at the end of each argumentative paragraph.
task achievement
Providing relevant examples strengthens the argument, but strive for more specific real-world instances or case studies to demonstrate a deeper understanding of the topic.