The graph shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 and 2010 in a particular country. Summarise the information by selecting and reportin the main features, making comparisions where relevant

The line graph illustrates the percentage of recycling materials in four different categories between 1982 and 2010.

Overall

Linking Words

,

it is clear that

Linking Words

the glass containers and paper and cardboard materials had significant portions,

whereas

Linking Words

the

aluminium

Use synonyms

cans and plastics only shared small percentages.

To begin

Linking Words

with, there was a fluctuation in the paper and cardboard category. The trend began at around 65% in 1982, and it grew considerably and reached a peak at 80% in 1994.

However

Linking Words

, it continued to decrease to 70% in 2010, yet it was still considered the highest proportion compared to the others.

Additionally

Linking Words

, the glass containers had a smaller starting point, which stood at 50% in 1982. It declined to 40% in 1990, but it bounced back and rose steadily to 60% in the finished period.

On the contrary

Linking Words

, the

aluminium

Use synonyms

cans category started to be recycled in 1986, which accounted for only below 10%. It climbed up and hit the pinnacle at around 45%

at the end

Linking Words

of the period.

Similarly

Linking Words

, the recycling agenda of plastics began at the same point as

aluminium

Use synonyms

bottles.

However

Linking Words

, the process started in 1990, four years after the recycling of

aluminium

Use synonyms

jars. It can be seen that its trend did not show a significant increase throughout the years, and it only managed to reach around 9% in 2010.