In order to solve the traffic problems governments should tax private car owners heavily and use their money to improve public transportation.

There's an opinion floating that to improve public transit, city authorities must impose an immense tax on the people possessing private cars, which is advantageous to a certain extent. The first notable point is that if the officials restrict the number of cars

to run

Change the verb form

running

show examples

, pollution will be reduced to approximately 30%, and

subsequently

benefit the environment and make the entire city livable.

For instance

, the policy-makers in Singapore, have the authority to register only a limited number of cars and

thereafter

modify the commute system by making it efficient. By doing

this

they managed to attract a significant proportion of individuals to avail

public

Change preposition

of public

show examples

transport. The above occurrence did not happen overnight but took place steadily. So, if the

law-makers

Correct your spelling

lawmakers

show examples

want to really bring a radical change,

its

Replace the word

it's

it is

show examples

imperative that they comprehensively upgrade the transport system.

Because many

Correct word choice

Many

show examples

would not give up their personal vehicle, the reason behind

that is

they might stay in rural areas where the area is not covered by public transport, or it may be because the car is more convenient to reach the destination. In

this

case, setting up metro and bus services with great connectivity should be the primary aim.

To conclude

, that by curbing personal vehicles, it will not only promote better health and quality

life

Change preposition

of life

show examples

but

also

enhance nature.

Moreover

, by doing so, the officials must bring remarkable changes like improving bus frequency and great connectivity.