All cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric cars should replace them. Do you agree or disagree?

It is argued that vehicles that consume natural gas must be forbidden, and

instead

, the applied alternative is supposed to be depending on electricity. I agree that the world needs to use gas-free transportation

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

because it saves the environment and looks more sophisticated. Personal means of transportation, which

does

Correct subject-verb agreement

do

show examples

not depend on

the

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

regenerated fuel sources, are environmentally friendly. Since burning gas, petrol and trees emit a lot of toxicity around the atmosphere,

then

, decreasing our reliance on

such

resources will absolutely provide healthier air.

Moreover

, the process of extracting

such

origins from our home nature requires many machines, trucks and digging. All of these produce unwanted particles of dust and pollution.

For instance

, in the Arab Gulf, companies need bulldozers to complete the mission of petrol extraction, and

then

, millions of vans are going to use it, which eventually, will be spreading toxins everywhere. Most of the electric trucks are modern and more appealing. Given the fact that the solar motors are new, that indicates they are more advanced. Many manufacturers compete in designing the most attractive vehicles, using many up-to-date technologies to get fabulous results. Taking Wols Wagen as an example, the new generations of ID cars are personalized to match the World’s most amazing standards in terms of elegance and convenience. In my view, it is essential to switch to carbon-free buses, for two reasons; reducing pollution and coping with developments.