The government's investment in arts, music and theatre is a waste of money. Governments should invest these funds in public services instead. To what extent do you agree with this statement?
In contemporary discourse, there exists a viewpoint asserting that investing government funds in
arts
, music
, and theatre is a waste of money. This
perspective underscores the value of immediate gratification over long-term strategic foresight. This
essay aims to delve into the merits and drawbacks of this
ideology, exploring its implications for public dawning.
On the first side, it is important to acknowledge that directing financial resources towards arts
, music
, and theatre fosters cultural enrichment and societal well-being. This
perspective posits that supporting these creative endeavours not only cultivates a vibrant cultural landscape but also
nurtures talents that contribute to a nation's identity and global influence. Moreover
, if well-managed, such
contribution can stimulate economic growth by attracting tourism and promoting related industries. For example
, bolstering music
festivals not only entertain
the public but Correct subject-verb agreement
entertains
also
stimulates local economies through increased tourism and hospitality dawning. Therefore
, understanding the multifaceted implications of cultural contribution is crucial for a holistic evaluation of their impact on society.
However
, on the flip side, proponents of meticulous resource allocation towards public services
argue that diverting funds to the arts
can lead to detrimental consequences. For example
, neglecting essential services
such
as healthcare, education, and infrastructure might jeopardize the overall
well-being of the population. This
lack of foresight can make communities vulnerable to various challenges, including inadequate healthcare facilities and subpar educational systems. Likewise
, when essential public services
are underfunded, the potential for social inequality increases, hindering the overall
development of a nation. In order to strike a balance, it is imperative to consider the long-term consequences of prioritizing cultural contribution over crucial public outset.
In conclusion, appreciating the value of both cultural enrichment and essential public outset is paramount for a well-rounded society. Balancing investments in arts
, music
, and theatre with the allocation of resources to public services
ensures a harmonious development that caters to the immediate needs and long-term prosperity of a nation.Submitted by Alma Islam on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Coherence & Cohesion
For coherence and cohesion, make sure that your essay maintains a clear and logical progression of ideas. Use transitional phrases to connect paragraphs and provide clear topic sentences at the beginning of each paragraph. The essay mostly did this, but there can be improvements in transitions and overall flow.
Task Achievement
Regarding task response, be sure to address the prompt fully by discussing both sides of the argument equitably and providing a clear opinion. Your examples should be specific and directly relevant to your point. In this essay, while both sides were acknowledged, specific examples were somewhat lacking, and the essay could benefit from more concise and relevant support for the arguments made.
Your opinion
Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.
If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.
Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.
Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:
...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?