Fossil fuel is the main source of energy. In some countries, the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged. To what extent do you think is it a positive or negative development?

The increasing rate of pollution in many nations makes the government focus on using renewable resources
such
as wind and solar energy
instead
of fossil fuels. From my perspective,
this
shift will create significantly positive improvements in expenditure and environmental problems. In
this
essay, I will shed light on my opinion and give specific examples. To commence with, alternative sources of energy are always available and cost-competitive to coal, oil and natural gas.
Firstly
, wind
,
Remove the comma
apply
show examples
and solar power are unlimited and nature constantly provides humans with these sorts .
Therefore
, the authority can take full advantage of eco-energy without incurring significant costs.
In addition
, politics can save a large amount of money by shifting towards eco-friendly power. More specifically, the business does not need to pay for the abundance of machines used for developing the resources.
For example
, in Holland, citizens are erecting numerous windmills to fully benefit from the wind and save a large amount for other fields.
On the other hand
, avoiding the complex progress of exploiting coal for non-renewable energy can prevent some detrimental consequences on the ecosystem. The first reason is that politics needs to invest a lot in supporting machinery and transportation to assist the process, which leads to tons of exhaust fumes released from production stages. What is more, the utilization of hydrocarbon deposits discharges carbon dioxide into the environment .
As a result
, the quality of the air has decreased considerably. Take Ha Noi of Vietnam as an example, the overuse of motorbikes and cars makes
this
city have the highest pollution rate in the world. In conclusion, switching to an alternative force helps the authority to save the capital for other social purposes and minimizes adverse influences on natural habitats.
Submitted by quynhtranhbh on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

coherence cohesion
Your essay contains an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion, which is positive. However, you should enhance the logical flow throughout your essay. Having a more clear progression of ideas will help the reader follow and understand your argument more easily. Consider using a wider range of cohesive devices and paragraphing that clearly separates your points.
task achievement
You have addressed the prompt, but a more explicit stance on whether the development is positive or negative would strengthen your response. Your ideas should be further expanded and show a deep analysis of the topic. Additionally, both sides of the argument could be more balanced to demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of the issue. Use specific, detailed examples to underpin each point you make.
What to do next:
Look at other essays: