nuclear power is far too dangerous; therefore, countries should ban its use and concentrate instead on developing alternative sources such as hydroelectric power and solar energy. To what extent do you agree?
There has been a long discussion as to whether nuclear
power
should be banned and developed from other alternative sources or not in history. While
it has a potential danger that may sacrifice the life
of living creatures, I generally disagree with the removal of nuclear Fix the agreement mistake
lives
power
for the number of benefits that it can bring to modern society.
On one hand, nuclear power
causes negative consequences because it is highly vulnerable to natural disasters. In other words
, nuclear power
plants are more affected by earthquakes which can lead to unexpected collapse. For example
, when a huge earthquake hit the northern part of Japan in 2011, harmful radiation was exposed to nature. This
leads to a number of negative outcomes both from perspectives of health and the environment. There is a growing risk of lethal diseases such
as cancer and brain strokes due to
the threatening radiation. In addition
to the increasing health concerns among humans, its damage has gone to wild animals whose life
is severely damaged to death. Since many issues regarding the safety of nuclear power
remain unsolved, it should be abandoned to seek other effective alternatives.
On the other hand
, nuclear power
should not be prohibited since it is an important source of energy
which essentially supports the current lifestyle. In fact, it provides an incredible amount of energy
in every aspect of life
including transportation, and industry.For instance
, more frequent travel has been made possible thanks to the abundance of energy
supply generated constantly by nuclear power
plants. It allows people to have a more advanced and satisfactory life
. The shortage of energy
can threaten individual safety when there is not enough power
for lights on the street. Therefore
, nuclear power
is a major source of energy
to protect higher quality of life
in modern society.
In conclusion, nuclear power
should be prohibited for its use since the problems regarding its safety remain unsolved. However
, it should be promoted to provide a sufficient supply of energy
because there have not been as effective alternatives as nuclear power
.Submitted by mizuho on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Task Achievement
Task Response: Your response partially addresses the prompt by presenting some arguments both for and against the use of nuclear power, yet it does not fully explore the extent of agreement or disagreement with the specific idea of banning nuclear power and focusing on alternatives, such as hydroelectric and solar energy. You should provide a more balanced discussion and, importantly, clearer examples related to the alternatives mentioned in the prompt.
Coherence and Cohesion
Coherence and Cohesion: The logical structure of your arguments could be improved by ensuring each paragraph focuses on a single main idea and that the arguments progress naturally from one to the next. This can be done by using a wider range of cohesive devices and clearer topic sentences. Furthermore, the introduction and conclusion should more accurately reflect the content and arguments in the body of the essay.
Ultimate Speaking practice for IELTS
Practice speaking step by step, answer real-life questions, and build your confidence. Start your free trial and improve your speaking skills today!