have different views about whether extreme
should be prohibited. In my opinion,
should be free to choose the activities they prefer as long as they are aware of the risks associated.
Indeed, there are a couple of reasons why some
assert that risky
should be banned. One primary reason is concerned with
issues, not only for individuals
,Remove the comma
show examples
but
for the public.
, when
are engaged in performing dangerous
, there is a high likelihood of getting an injury since they are usually performed in remote areas far from the reach of medical care. Getting pleasure and adrenaline rush at the cost of their life, they might not only be involved in the accidents
,Remove the comma
show examples
but
indirectly encourage others who are less experienced to try, which might result in
threatAdd an article
show examples
to public
. A good case point can be
a Correct article usage
show examples
bungee jumping which seems attractive, yet when tried without the presence of supervisors, it is highly likely to be injured or die considering the elements of risk.
Others,
, argue against
idea, stating
theCorrect determiner usage
show examples
personal freedom in decision making. In fact, undertaking extreme
can be a form of entertainment as they are mostly performed outdoors, and when completing a difficult task,
get feelings which other less extreme
may not give
as dopamine.
, putting a ban on these activities limits
the Correct article usage
show examples
personal freedom in
decision makingAdd a hyphen
show examples
, causing a debate among
.
, extreme
,
some, can contribute to personal growth, meaning that
can achieve a mastery of particular skill as long as they are experienced.
, notable
marshalCorrect your spelling
show examples
art fighters
as Khabib trains
hisCorrect pronoun usage
show examples
body in
an Remove the article
show examples
extremely cold water to master
hisCorrect pronoun usage
show examples
craft. By doing so, he can take his skills to
nextCorrect article usage
show examples
level, developing his techniques.
In my opinion, banning extreme
is both unnecessary and impractical. As technologies
developedWrong verb form
show examples
, a variety of
tools and measures are available if one wants to partake in extreme activities, which alleviates the risks.
, a person who undertakes a dangerous activity cannot perform without the first training and under
the Correct article usage
show examples
supervision, which
helps reduce
the Correct article usage
show examples
accidents.
, banning these
is impractical since they are mostly performed in high mountains or in the ocean, far from the reach of the police or regulatory authorities. It is hard to imagine the police is stopping the person who parachuting on the edge of the mountain
,Remove the comma
show examples
or surfing under the high waves.
In conclusion,
some
approve of banning extreme
for
reasons, others are against
idea
personal freedom.
, I would argue that cutting-edge
equipment and the impossibility of regulations render
issue obsolete.