The government should impose a fee on drivers who use their vehicle during rush hour to help cut down on air pollution from exhaust fumes. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

One
policy
that is
currently being debated in society concerns the issue of whether the government should impose a fee on
drivers
who use their
vehicles
during rush hour to reduce
pollution
. Even though there are some people who think that
this
policy
is negative, I personally think
this
policy
would be effective because it would lead to smooth traffic conditions. First of all, the
policy
of charging
fees
for driving in busy areas during peak hours would be advantageous because most
drivers
will react sensitively to additional financial
fees
.
For example
,
due to
the fact that most of the
drivers
that would be affected by
this
traffic fee are those who are using
vehicles
for leisure-related purposes, these
drivers
can control when and where they have to travel.
For
this
reason, trying to control their choices by charging financial
fees
would give them an incentive to drive less often and successfully reduce the emission of air
pollution
from exhaust fumes.
This
shows that implementing financial penalties for using
vehicles
will have a generally positive effect on the status of air
pollution
.
Moreover
, it is acknowledged that charging
fees
to reduce
pollution
and the usage of
vehicles
can
also
lead to positive environmental effects because
this
policy
would encourage the preservation of the natural environment.
For example
, people would respond to these compulsory
fees
by considering their
overall
impact on the environment and reducing other forms of
pollution
,
such
as waste
pollution
from garbage.
Due to
this
, the condition of the ecosystem would improve.
This
demonstrates that using financial
fees
to reduce
pollution
is an optimal strategy to fix
this
issue.
Overall
, after considering both of these perspectives, I agree that imposing
fees
on
drivers
who use their
vehicles
during rush hour can help cut down on air
pollution
from exhaust fumes.
This
is
due to
the fact that I personally believe that the effects of
such
a
policy
will ultimately alleviate environmental problems.
Submitted by lss870311 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Task Achievement
Make sure your introduction clearly outlines your stance on the issue and briefly mentions the main points you'll cover. This establishes a strong foundation for your essay.
Coherence and Cohesion
Incorporate a wider range of linking devices to enhance the flow of your essay. While you've used them effectively, more variety could improve the readability and coherence.
Task Achievement
Provide more specific examples to support your arguments. Use real-life scenarios, data, or studies to make your points more convincing and detailed.
Task Achievement
While your conclusion summarizes your viewpoint well, try to add a reflective thought or suggest future implications of the policy to make your essay more thought-provoking.
Coherence and Cohesion
For even better coherence and cohesion, consider revising your essay to ensure that each paragraph flows smoothly into the next. Transition sentences can be particularly useful for this.

Include an introduction and conclusion

A conclusion is essential for IELTS writing task 2. It is more important than most people realise. You will be penalised for missing a conclusion in your IELTS essay.

The easiest paragraph to write in an essay is the conclusion paragraph. This is because the paragraph mostly contains information that has already been presented in the essay – it is just the repetition of some information written in the introduction paragraph and supporting paragraphs.

The conclusion paragraph only has 3 sentences:

  • Summary
  • Restatement of thesis
  • Prediction or recommendation

Example:

To summarize, a robotic teacher does not have the necessary disciple to properly give instructions to students and actually works to retard the ability of a student to comprehend new lessons. Therefore, it is clear that the idea of running a classroom completely by a machine cannot be supported. After thorough analysis on this subject, it is predicted that the adverse effects of the debate over technology-driven teaching will always be greater than the positive effects, and because of this, classroom teachers will never be substituted for technology.

Start your conclusion with a linking phrase. Here are some examples:

  • In conclusion
  • To conclude
  • To summarize
  • Finally
  • In a nutshell
  • In general

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: