Some people think that the best way to reduce the time spent traveling to work is to replace parks and gardens close to the city center with apartment buildings for commuters, but others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Some comment that open

spaces

should be replaced with residential buildings to cut the travel time of city commuters,

whereas

others hold a different perspective. In

this

essay, both sides will be explored, followed by my opinions. On the one hand, supporters of scarifying green

spaces

argue that

this

approach can significantly reduce commuting time for workers. By providing houses closer to the city centre, employees could have shorter travel distances, resulting in less time spent on travel and public transport.

This

could lead to increased productivity and reduced stress, helping in maintaining a healthy work-life balance.

Additionally

, utilizing land occupied by

parks

and

gardens

can develop more residential apartments which can alleviate the housing shortage, making accommodation more accessible and affordable for city dwellers.

On the other hand

, others oppose

this

approach because they believe that

parks

and

gardens

bring numerous benefits to the community and society.

Firstly

, these places provide a green space for all members of the community, regardless of socioeconomic status, for relaxation and socialization. To be more specific, green

spaces

are often a perfect spot for people to engage in several outdoor activities,

such

as physical exercises, social gatherings and recreational activities, fostering physical health and

overall

well-being.

Secondly

, preserving

parks

and

gardens

could contribute to protecting ecosystems by providing habitats for wildlife, improving air quality and mitigating the heat island effect. Removing these green

spaces

could lead to increased pollution, reduced biodiversity and diminished quality of life for urban residents. In conclusion,

while

it may be tempting to prioritize efficiency and convenience by replacing

parks

and

gardens

with apartment buildings, it is essential to consider its long-term consequences and the holistic needs of communities. Sustainable urban development requires a balance between environmental, residential and recreational

spaces

, promoting environmental stewardship, public health and social well-being. Rather than scarifying open

spaces

, cities should explore innovative solutions, including transit-oriented development, green infrastructure and compact urban design to create vibrant and resilient environments for future generations.