Presently, it is a prevailing phenomenon that the majority of the population of each
are working 9 to 5 or even 9 to 6 in some countries. Many
overtime during unsocial hours, early in the morning, late at night, or on holidays. Some
assert that the working days must be reduced in order to benefit the individuals. I
attempt to outline some possible reasons for
, predicting the obstacles that might be encountered.
Obviously, having more free
would be beneficial for each person, as it would allow them to spend
with their family members and do recreational activities.
, devoting
to family members would possibly prevent domestic problems, which could lead to the distribution of broken homes, single parents, and adopted children.
, they would have far more
doing hobbies like art, music or sports.
can positively affect and improve the soft skills necessary for
,
as concentration and continuous effort, which are an indispensable part of learning to do any artwork or play a musical instrument.
, by giving more
to family and their interests,
can create a close-knit family that could be felt in
and
master some crucial skills, optimizing their working
tasks.
, lower incomes would damage workers’ quality of life unless they are paid as much as they have been paid. If decreasing the number of working days means that employees would earn less money, facing general nonacceptance by the
laborChange the spelling
show examples
community.
,
problem could be solved by the intervention of the government, managing a flawless timetable, and supporting citizens to compensate for their earnings loss.
, expectations of
have been increasing, especially during the
century
the advent of technology, and
, they tend to
overtime, to improve the standard of their life. So, it is for the government to control how much
.
In conclusion, I maintain that limiting the working
members are undertaking can have merits for both individuals and the
itself. They can master different activities and
use them to increase the pace of procedures in their workplace.
,
could be practical only with government assistance and by precise planning and paying support.