Presently, it is a prevailing phenomenon that the majority of the population of each
society
are working 9 to 5 or even 9 to 6 in some countries. Many
work
overtime during unsocial hours, early in the morning, late at night, or on holidays. Some
people
assert that the working days must be reduced in order to benefit the individuals. I
therefore
attempt to outline some possible reasons for
this
, predicting the obstacles that might be encountered.
Obviously, having more free
time
would be beneficial for each person, as it would allow them to spend
time
with their family members and do recreational activities.
Firstly
, devoting
time
to family members would possibly prevent domestic problems, which could lead to the distribution of broken homes, single parents, and adopted children.
Furthermore
, they would have far more
time
doing hobbies like art, music or sports.
This
can positively affect and improve the soft skills necessary for
work
,
such
as concentration and continuous effort, which are an indispensable part of learning to do any artwork or play a musical instrument.
Therefore
, by giving more
time
to family and their interests,
people
can create a close-knit family that could be felt in
society
and
also
master some crucial skills, optimizing their working
time
tasks.
On the other hand
, lower incomes would damage workers’ quality of life unless they are paid as much as they have been paid. If decreasing the number of working days means that employees would earn less money, facing general nonacceptance by the
laborChange the spelling
show examples
community.
However
,
this
problem could be solved by the intervention of the government, managing a flawless timetable, and supporting citizens to compensate for their earnings loss.
In addition
, expectations of
people
have been increasing, especially during the
last
century
due to
the advent of technology, and
as a result
, they tend to
work
overtime, to improve the standard of their life. So, it is for the government to control how much
people
work
.
In conclusion, I maintain that limiting the working
time
society
members are undertaking can have merits for both individuals and the
society
itself. They can master different activities and
subsequently
use them to increase the pace of procedures in their workplace.
However
,
this
could be practical only with government assistance and by precise planning and paying support.