It is suggested that the public funding should go into the public service sector rather than investing in the arts. I firmly agree with
this
idea because it makes people live a better life and helps deprived residents.
First of all, investing in the public sector can improve the quality of Linking Words
services
that people receive, it is because , with insufficient funds, many public Use synonyms
services
are struggling with underfunded situations, which impact the quality of Use synonyms
services
negatively. Use synonyms
For instance
, many not-for-profit organisations, Linking Words
such
as community engagement, disability support and aged care Linking Words
services
have to shut down or reject new applications Use synonyms
due to
the lack of Linking Words
government
funding. Use synonyms
Hence
, it is crucial for the authorities to allocate money to the public sector in order to maintain the above Linking Words
services
to the residents.
Another reason why Use synonyms
the
Correct article usage
apply
government
investment should be distributed to public Use synonyms
services
is that it helps to narrow the gap between the haves and have-nots. The disadvantaged group is usually facing financial hardship which hinders them from seeking help. Use synonyms
However
, with the funds from the Linking Words
government
, many of the deprived people can enjoy Use synonyms
the
free-of-charge Correct article usage
apply
services
without worrying about their financial status. Use synonyms
For instance
, free health care is available to low-income families in many European countries, as their governments distribute a large portion of the tax revenue into public Linking Words
services
.
In conclusion, it is wiser that Use synonyms
Use synonyms
government
should invest in Correct article usage
the government
services
to the public as it improves the living standard of the Use synonyms
overall
population and helps to close the gap between the rich and poor.Linking Words
Ming