In some countries, the government has tried to reduce traffic. For instance, they imposed a congestion tax during rush hour. Do you think this development is positive? or negative?

It is prevalently observed that the authorities have tried to reduce traffic by imposing a
congestion
tax
during rush hour. From
this
aspect, questions about whether
this
phenomenon is a positive or negative development are raised. In my opinion, imposing a
congestion
tax
is ideal. Irrefutably, citizens are more likely to utilise public transport.
This
is because they spend a small amount of transportation costs to take the transport compared to driving vehicles and rarely pay
congestion
taxes.
This
obviously leads to saving money and
this
turn allows them to invest in other sectors,
such
as housing rent, education, and living costs. What is more,
although
the convenience of driving cannot be ignored, those who are not driving become healthy. In actual fact, health studies undertaken by experts have revealed that individuals walking or using transports tend to walk at least 30 minutes a day and have a low obesity rate so, they can live a prolonged life more than drivers.
Nevertheless
, the
tax
pressure increases.
In other words
, since the installation of
tax
stations and staff employment are more likely to make a rise in general traffic
tax
as well as
congestion
tax
, each driver would pay a great deal of traffic taxes, so they can struggle with saving money in daily life. To recapitulate, the
tax
pressure increases but citizens are more likely to utilise public transport and those who are not driving become healthy.
Thus
, imposing a
congestion
tax
is ideal.
Submitted by subin12260 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Task Achievement
Consider expanding on the negative aspects of congestion taxing for a more balanced viewpoint.
Coherence and Cohesion
Integrating more varied transitional phrases could enhance the flow between ideas.
Coherence and Cohesion
For higher bands, aim to refine complex sentence structures and incorporate a wider range of vocabulary for more sophistication.
Task Achievement
Effectively introduced and concluded the essay, offering a clear stance throughout.
Task Achievement
Good use of examples to support main points, making the argument persuasive.
Coherence and Cohesion
Logical structure with clear progression of ideas.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: