Nowadays, because of the expansion of consuming fast
by people,
risks have risen dramatically.
some countries exert significant amounts of
on
type of
, I personally disagree with the idea that the authorities of
nationalAdd an article
show examples
economy must receive heavy
from junk
.
Some people argue that imposing heavy
on the providers of
type of
may help
go downVerb problem
show examples
the dangerous
caused by
excessiveCorrect article usage
show examples
of junk
. They introduce a number of arguments for their point of view. First of all,
their perspective, exerting large amounts of
can lead to a decline in the production of chain restaurants. A decrease in supply in turn leads to a decrease in consumption and
,
risks
as obesity, cardiovascular
, hypertension and diabetes will be reduced.
,
tax policy may encourage lots of fast
to change their businesses and be motivated to launch producing healthy
as vegetarian
. With the prevalence of healthy
restaurant chains, people’s interest and desire to eat healthy
and follow a balanced diet will increase.
,
the Correct article usage
show examples
society will suffer less from the
resulting from the consumption of sugar, fat and carbohydrates.
,Remove the comma
show examples
there is no doubt that the increasing consumption of fast
has resulted in a huge number of
problems among people, I personally disagree with the idea that governments must impose heavy
on the
of
kind of
. There are some reasons for
point of view. Fast
is one of the most prosperous
production industries that offers a large number of job opportunities and
playCorrect subject-verb agreement
show examples
an important role in the prosperity
nationalChange preposition
show examples
, regional and local economies. Exerting higher
on fast
may lead to the failure of relevant businesses,
loseReplace the word
show examples
of job opportunities and ultimately, harmful consequences for national and local businesses.
,
tax policy could not be an effective solution and its negative outcomes will be more than its positive results. In my opinion, governments can mitigate the negative effects of eating too much junk
on people’s
through various effective ways.
, they can aware fast
consumers about the detrimental impacts of eating too
muchChange the quantifier
show examples
calories, sugar, carbohydrates and fats on their
through influential advertisements.
, national governments, especially,
care authorities should obligate fast
to use healthy ingredients and meat sanitary practices during preparing their products.
In conclusion,
eating too much fast
can result in many dangerous
, there are some effective ways to avoid their hazardous influences on people’s
,
as informative advertising campaigns by national authorities about their
consequences and compelling their providers to meet
and sanitary standards. These methods might be more effective than imposing high
.