In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food. Do you agree?

Nowadays, because of the expansion of consuming fast

food

by people,

health

risks have risen dramatically.

While

some countries exert significant amounts of

taxes

on

this

type of

food

, I personally disagree with the idea that the authorities of

national

Add an article

the national

show examples

economy must receive heavy

taxes

from junk

food

suppliers

. Some people argue that imposing heavy

taxes

on the providers of

this

type of

food

may help

go down

Verb problem

reduce

show examples

the dangerous

diseases

caused by

excessive

Correct article usage

the excessive

show examples

of junk

food

. They introduce a number of arguments for their point of view. First of all,

according to

their perspective, exerting large amounts of

taxes

can lead to a decline in the production of chain restaurants. A decrease in supply in turn leads to a decrease in consumption and

subsequently

,

health

risks

such

as obesity, cardiovascular

diseases

, hypertension and diabetes will be reduced.

Secondly

,

this

tax policy may encourage lots of fast

food

suppliers

to change their businesses and be motivated to launch producing healthy

food

such

as vegetarian

food

. With the prevalence of healthy

food

restaurant chains, people’s interest and desire to eat healthy

food

and follow a balanced diet will increase.

As a result

,

the

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

society will suffer less from the

diseases

resulting from the consumption of sugar, fat and carbohydrates.

While

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

there is no doubt that the increasing consumption of fast

food

has resulted in a huge number of

health

problems among people, I personally disagree with the idea that governments must impose heavy

taxes

on the

suppliers

of

this

kind of

food

. There are some reasons for

this

point of view. Fast

food

is one of the most prosperous

food

production industries that offers a large number of job opportunities and

play

Correct subject-verb agreement

plays

show examples

an important role in the prosperity

national

Change preposition

of national

show examples

, regional and local economies. Exerting higher

taxes

on fast

food

suppliers

may lead to the failure of relevant businesses,

lose

Replace the word

loss

show examples

of job opportunities and ultimately, harmful consequences for national and local businesses.

Therefore

,

this

tax policy could not be an effective solution and its negative outcomes will be more than its positive results. In my opinion, governments can mitigate the negative effects of eating too much junk

food

on people’s

health

through various effective ways.

Firstly

, they can aware fast

food

consumers about the detrimental impacts of eating too

much

Change the quantifier

many

show examples

calories, sugar, carbohydrates and fats on their

health

through influential advertisements.

Secondly

, national governments, especially,

health

care authorities should obligate fast

food

suppliers

to use healthy ingredients and meat sanitary practices during preparing their products. In conclusion,

although

eating too much fast

food

can result in many dangerous

diseases

, there are some effective ways to avoid their hazardous influences on people’s

health

,

such

as informative advertising campaigns by national authorities about their

health

consequences and compelling their providers to meet

health

and sanitary standards. These methods might be more effective than imposing high

taxes

.