Some people believe that it is better to live and work in a vertical city with multiple tall buildings, as compared to a horizontal city with fewer tall buildings. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

There are many considerations that people should give priority to residing and working in tall constructions because of their advantages,

while

others prefer the low ones.

This

writer agrees with the former and gives some main reasons to explain both views.

To begin

with, it should be

noticed

Verb problem

noted

show examples

that a horizontal city has its own benefits in terms of safety and a sense of privacy. To explain, saving people from unpredictable situations is less

challenged

Replace the word

challenging

show examples

compared to

live

Wrong verb form

living

show examples

in high

buildings

, preventing them from profound

damages

Fix the agreement mistake

damage

show examples

.

Besides

, low-rise structures seem more firm to withstand natural disasters or extreme ones

such

as

earthquake

Fix the agreement mistake

earthquakes

show examples

and

huriccane

Correct your spelling

hurricanes

.

Consequently

, those

buildings

ensured

the

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

high protection in surrounding areas for

human

Fix the agreement mistake

humans

show examples

to live in.

However

, during the overpopulation period, vertical

buildings

provide much more accommodation for people to reside and work in. To clarify, the density of the population leads to many considerable problems including housing shortages and the pricey expenditure of owning a place. Skyscrapers offer a highly efficient use of limited urban space, accommodating a significantly larger population within the same land area that low-rise

buildings

would require.

Thus

, the remaining land can be used for other purposes, improving the living standard and solving considerable issues of the globe.