The line graph illustrates the fish and some kind of
meat
portion per person per week between 1979 and 2004 in a European country.
As follows, in 1979 fish consumption was around 60 and lower down gradually until about 40 people per week in 2004. Lamb Use synonyms
meat
consumption was 150 in 1979 and dipped down by around 120 between 1979 to 1984. Apart from brief fluctuations and increased by about 130 in 1988. After that dramatically decreased until 1994 and rose up to 90 in 1998 and sharp falls to 60 in 2000 and the same level upto 2001. Use synonyms
However
, an increase of 70 in 2002 and fall to around 60 in 2003 and finishes at the same level in 2004.
In 1979 Linking Words
meat
expenditure was about 220 and dipped down to around 180 in 1981,again a sharp increase in 1983 until around 240 and Use synonyms
also
dramatically decreased with significant fluctuations until around 130 in 2004. About 140 of chicken expenditure in 1979 overtook lamb Linking Words
meat
at the bigging of 1980 and the line runs around 130 in 1981. Gradually down to 150 in 1983 and increased to around 200 in 1989 and exceeded Use synonyms
beef
utilization. The end of 1988 overtook down Use synonyms
beef
. But, the beginning of 1989 exceeds Use synonyms
beef
consumption. In 2004 chicken utilization was around 250 with significant fluctuations.
From approximately, 1979 to 2004 chicken grams per person per week dramatically increased and Use synonyms
beef
,lamb,and fish consumed significantly decreased.Use synonyms
amalitharangani0Most of villagers are changing their accommodations from villages to cities all around the world. As a result of this countryside residents are lower than town areas.I think this is a negative development and in this essay, I will elaborate my perspectives furthermore.
According to this situation, my take on this is, different of the facilities between the town and the village. As an example, there are lots of shopping centres in the city such as house- hold items, clothes, stationeries, vehicles and so on. Conversely, developed educational centres, schools, hospitals with enough facilities are also at the urban areas. Nevertheless, there are lots of companies and unlimited job opportunities in the city area. Also, mostly there are continuous electricity, gas,water and well planned and punctual transport system as well. So people prefer to live in comfortably and moving to cities as they possible.
Additionally, villagers and town people's have same basic need. Such as food, accommodation, education, good health and freedom as well. In some countries there is unavailable electricity in the countryside. Also, there is poor transport system, teachers and facilities at village schools. Moreover, sometimes not enough medications and human resources. So countryside people preferred to move to town. Finally, countryside population decreased and urbanisation in cities.
In a nutshell, if there is as usual same facilities all over the city and rural areas,as there is lots of freedom in the countryside . My point of view is around the world this point is most prominent in developing countries.