The graph below shows the average monthly change in the prices of three metals during 2014. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

A glance at the line graph delineates information about the commensurability of the monthly price variation of three metals in the year 2014.

Overall

, it can be explicitly perceived that there was a fluctuating income during

this

twelve-month period, with a least in

June

. Concerning

nickel

and

copper

, the rudimentary alteration of the former was 6%, which is immense compared to 2% of

copper

. Not only

nickel

but

also

copper

had staggeringly plunge nosedived to the minimal -3% and approximately -0.5% in

June

, respectively.

This

was followed by exponential growth in July, including -1 per cent for

nickel

and 1% for

copper

, accompanied by a plateau for subsequent twofold. After a vacillation, both metals were enhanced and had relatively the same amount

at the end

of the year, somewhere in the vicinity of 1% for

nickel

and 1.5% for

copper

. The average monthly change of zinc, meanwhile, commenced by 1%, before 3% in February. Similar to the other metals, it encountered a dire recession of -1% till

June

and thriving of -0.5% during the next three months. Over a little-by-little decline in October, equal to

June

, dramatically soared to the percentage of 2 in December.