Several processed food and beverage products have been known
containFix the infinitive
show examples
high amounts of glucose, which in
returnReplace the word
show examples
deteriorate the medical state of humans.
However
, there is contention over whether their prices should be increased in order to discourage their consumption. I personally believe that
such
harmful produce should be made less affordable as not only will
this
encourage consumers to look for
further
, healthier alternatives, but it
also
has the potential to
decrease
the frequency at which they intake
such
damaging items.
To begin
with, one key advantage
withChange preposition
show examples
a substantially increased cost is that it will encourage customers to search for cheaper substitutes, as opposed to continuing
relyingChange the verb form
show examples
on
the Correct article usage
show examples
unhealthier products.
Consequently
,
this
will
therefore
decrease
the quantity of sugar-containing substances they consume
such
as Sodas or Ice Cream on a common basis when the government artificially lowers the
price
.
This
will in return
decrease
their average blood sugar levels, which are associated
to reduceChange preposition
show examples
the risk of some of the most long-lasting, damaging and common health issues which derive from high quantities of sucrose intake
such
as Diabetes or in most grave instances, Heart Attacks. It is
therefore
unsurprising that
such
policies are becoming more and more enforced on
worldwideAdd an article
show examples
level.
This
is already being done and has been propagated in the United Kingdom, where a ‘Sugar Tax’
has beenWrong verb form
show examples
introduced not so long ago on sugary drinks
such
as Fanta, Sprite or
Coca ColaAdd a hyphen
show examples
.
Hence
, if imposed effectively, it is my notion that higher payments for
such
manufactured consumer durables will significantly improve the physical
wellbeingCorrect your spelling
show examples
of the
overall
population
,Remove the comma
show examples
since they become more incentivised to look for healthier, sugar-free alternatives.
Similarly
,
such
a noticeable change in the pricing will
decrease
the frequency at which people purchase sucrose-filled durables. In the presence of
such
a difference,
although
those demanding
such
goods will likely remain addicted
in contrast
to if they were banned altogether, in the long term, they will become more disincentivised to consume them.
This
is because as the
price
rises, over time the total annual proportion of their income
which Correct pronoun usage
show examples
they spent on
such
health deteriorating produce
such
as Brownies or Candy will increase, which will
as a result
encourage them to spend it more productively on other, healthier activities like on sports
such
as Boxing. To exemplify
this
, a higher
price
has
also
been implemented in San Francisco, California, where sellers now charge twice or even triple as much in comparison to previous times for sweetened drinks
such
as ‘Powerade.’
By contrast
, without
such
government
legislationsFix the agreement mistake
show examples
, buyers would continue having
a Remove the article
show examples
greater financial accessibility to
such
manufactured sugary refreshments.
This
is why I firmly believe that
wellbeingCorrect your spelling
show examples
issues can be overcome through
such
policies, despite the potential discontent among buyers
the added surcharge.
In conclusion, whilst there may be certain discontent and disarray by those
to in taking sugar-filled nourishments and refreshments, I would personally agree that they should be set a higher
price
because not only will
this
actively encourage buyers to look for healthier alternatives, but will
also
decrease
the extent at which they buy
such
unhealthy products.