Several processed food and beverage products have been known
containFix the infinitive
show examples
high amounts of glucose, which in
returnReplace the word
show examples
deteriorate the medical state of humans.
, there is contention over whether their prices should be increased in order to discourage their consumption. I personally believe that
harmful produce should be made less affordable as not only will
encourage consumers to look for
, healthier alternatives, but it
has the potential to
the frequency at which they intake
damaging items.
with, one key advantage
withChange preposition
show examples
a substantially increased cost is that it will encourage customers to search for cheaper substitutes, as opposed to continuing
relyingChange the verb form
show examples
on
the Correct article usage
show examples
unhealthier products.
,
will
the quantity of sugar-containing substances they consume
as Sodas or Ice Cream on a common basis when the government artificially lowers the
.
will in return
their average blood sugar levels, which are associated
to reduceChange preposition
show examples
the risk of some of the most long-lasting, damaging and common health issues which derive from high quantities of sucrose intake
as Diabetes or in most grave instances, Heart Attacks. It is
unsurprising that
policies are becoming more and more enforced on
worldwideAdd an article
show examples
level.
is already being done and has been propagated in the United Kingdom, where a ‘Sugar Tax’
has beenWrong verb form
show examples
introduced not so long ago on sugary drinks
as Fanta, Sprite or
Coca ColaAdd a hyphen
show examples
.
, if imposed effectively, it is my notion that higher payments for
manufactured consumer durables will significantly improve the physical
wellbeingCorrect your spelling
show examples
of the
population
,Remove the comma
show examples
since they become more incentivised to look for healthier, sugar-free alternatives.
,
a noticeable change in the pricing will
the frequency at which people purchase sucrose-filled durables. In the presence of
a difference,
those demanding
goods will likely remain addicted
to if they were banned altogether, in the long term, they will become more disincentivised to consume them.
is because as the
rises, over time the total annual proportion of their income
which Correct pronoun usage
show examples
they spent on
health deteriorating produce
as Brownies or Candy will increase, which will
encourage them to spend it more productively on other, healthier activities like on sports
as Boxing. To exemplify
, a higher
has
been implemented in San Francisco, California, where sellers now charge twice or even triple as much in comparison to previous times for sweetened drinks
as ‘Powerade.’
, without
government
legislationsFix the agreement mistake
show examples
, buyers would continue having
a Remove the article
show examples
greater financial accessibility to
manufactured sugary refreshments.
is why I firmly believe that
wellbeingCorrect your spelling
show examples
issues can be overcome through
policies, despite the potential discontent among buyers
the added surcharge.
In conclusion, whilst there may be certain discontent and disarray by those
to in taking sugar-filled nourishments and refreshments, I would personally agree that they should be set a higher
because not only will
actively encourage buyers to look for healthier alternatives, but will
the extent at which they buy
unhealthy products.