The debate exists on whether young people should have the freedom to select their own profession or if they should adopt a pragmatic approach, considering their future more seriously. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

It is argued whether youngsters ought to consider their perspective in a practical method. Personally, I am convinced that it is better for them to have the freedom to choose their profession. In

this

essay, I will interpret both perspectives and present my opinion. On the one hand, choosing some highly skilled jobs,

such

as doctors, engineers, and dentists, can enjoy a fruitful plan in a materialistic sense compared to other non-professional occupations.

For instance

,

although

psychologists are required to learn plenty of expertise and participate in practical internships during the school period, they tend to have a well-paid remuneration after graduating.

Consequently

, some individuals who put emphasis on material life would recognize the opinion that a reliable profession is prominent in the forthcoming.

On the other hand

, if young people can choose an occupation by themselves, it would contribute to some advantages.

Firstly

, they would have much passion and motivation to accomplish all the tasks since the profession was selected by themselves.

Moreover

, as soon as they face problems in the imminent, they will possess much willingness to address obstacles.

Secondly

, I believe that one’s growth should be dominated by themselves rather than arranged by parents or society's expectations. Take a clear example, most Asia parents are used to arranging the career

as well as

life path for their children,

whereas

not only do the children not gain a better heart but

also

feel unsatisfied. In conclusion, despite the fact that considering future jobs more seriously and selecting a professional job can lead to a well-paid life, I still believe that freely choosing what your passion on is more important.