In recent times, people have argued that developing countries should provide six years of free
education
to reduce poverty. partly agree with Use synonyms
this
point of view.
First and foremost, we should recognize that free Linking Words
education
for at least six years is important to build children's basic knowledge and necessary Use synonyms
skills
. There is no denying that it is a vital opportunity for them to be equipped with a variety of Use synonyms
skills
, Use synonyms
such
as reading, writing, and using numbers. It is Linking Words
also
the foundation for them to access higher academic Linking Words
education
. One other justification is that free Use synonyms
education
makes Use synonyms
education
more accessible. Families having financial burdens will be able to afford their children's tuition fees. Free Use synonyms
education
even provides more opportunities for girls to attend school, which not only breaks the cycle of poverty but Use synonyms
also
solves the problem of gender equality.
Linking Words
On the other hand
, there are several reasons against the statement. Primary Linking Words
education
might not provide practical knowledge and Use synonyms
skills
, especially in an industrial and modern society. Use synonyms
For instance
, many jobs require applicants to have secondary and higher academic levels degrees and computer Linking Words
skills
. Use synonyms
In addition
, free Linking Words
education
requires financial support from the government. That leads to an increase in tax rates, which might affect individuals' savings and economic growth.
In conclusion, I partly support giving up to six years of free Use synonyms
education
. Use synonyms
However
, I believe that we should consider Linking Words
this
issue carefully before making a final decision.Linking Words
anhpham.712688