some people think that using animals for experimentation purpose is cruel, but other people think that it is necessary for the development of science. Discuss both view and your opinion.

There is an opinion saying that experiments on
animals
are not ethical.
While
others advocate it is inevitable since progress in science has relied on
such
behaviour. I would agree with the first view because
animals
' lives are as important as human life. I would like to express my views by elaborating both points of view. On one hand, supporters of using other
creatures
as the subject of science assert that the benefits accruing to human beings are by no means negligible. From their perspective, the only way that researchers can make sure their findings are not harmful to mankind is to apply them to
animals
. Take cosmetic products as an example; a huge quantity of make-up products are used on them to make sure they will not cause any injuries to people.
Furthermore
, human beings are the most important
creatures
on the earth and must be the scientists' priority
therefore
, hurting
animals
is justified in
this
way.
On the other hand
, others put forward the argument that harming
animals
to make development science is far from humanity.
In other words
, it is not convincing that because human
want
Change the verb form
wants
show examples
to progress in their life quality, they have
this
right to torture other
creatures
.
For instance
, recent
researche
Correct your spelling
research
researcher
has shown that thousands of different species are suffered and killed brutally by researchers to anticipate the side effects of new drugs and remedies.
In addition
, they feel pain as much as individuals do. If they cannot speak it does not mean that they do not feel anything. It has been seen that they scream and whine over injuries.
To conclude
, I believe the earth belongs to all
creatures
and none of them is preferable to others
and
Correct word choice
apply
show examples
scientists need to find alternative ways to test their discoveries.
Submitted by m.tavasoli18 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task response
Your task response is good, but could be further improved by providing more specific and developed examples to back up your points. Try to include research studies, statistical data, or more detailed anecdotes.
coherence cohesion
The essay generally follows a logical structure, but some of your arguments could be more clearly connected with linking words or phrases. This will enhance the overall flow and make it easier for the reader to follow your line of reasoning.
introduction conclusion present
Your introduction sets the premise well by clearly stating both views before presenting your opinion. This is a strong start that clearly frames the discussion.
introduction conclusion present
Your conclusion effectively summarizes the primary stance you take in the essay and calls for a humane alternative. This makes for a compelling and memorable closing.
supported main points
You have presented balanced arguments for both sides of the issue. This demonstrates an understanding of the complexity of the issue and an ability to discuss different perspectives.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • Animal experimentation
  • Cruelty
  • Ethical dilemmas
  • Medical breakthroughs
  • In vivo testing
  • In vitro testing
  • Bioethics
  • Alternative methods
  • Regulatory oversight
  • Vivisection
  • Animal welfare
  • Pharmacological research
  • Toxicology
  • Clinical trials
  • Moral imperatives
What to do next:
Look at other essays: