Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in science research, business and academic word. Others believe that some information is too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Whether publicizing scientific, business and academic
information
or findings is beneficial or not has sparked considerable controversy. While
some assume that sharing this
information
would interrupt the ongoing process
, I, along with
others, believe that it is best to make them as transparent as possible due to
the reasons this
essay further
elaborates on.
Proponents of hindering people
from knowing the latest news regarding science, business or academics, emphasize the safety of this
valuable information
. By adopting careful approaches, they ensure only those involved in the process
are aware of the methodology, materials or resources being used. During cosmetic production, for instance
, scientists conduct secret experiments on rabbits to make sure the product works efficiently. In many cases, these experiments make rabbits prone to several diseases, intensifying their mortality rate. Despite the community's disagreement on this
procedure, scientists believe that society's awareness would disrupt the process
and prevent it from achieving novel insights. However
, this
perspective often overlooks the gap this
situation establishes between people
and the authorities.
On the other hand
, many countries prioritize proving their trustworthiness to society. By illustrating the information
they gain in any area, coupled with
the process
through which it has been acquired, they bridge the gap between themselves and society but forging trust. Take Iranian manufacturers as an example, they have a fixed weekly schedule for making the production volume known to the public. In addition
, they declare if the investments are being used in environmentally friendly ways, reducing the industrial carbon footprints. Such
announcement fosters confidence in people
and assures them that their tax payments are being utilized in legitimate and eco-friendly processes, therefore
; they would show more engagement and contribute more to the community and the government.
To conclude
, while
some advocate for preventing people
from knowing the information
and the procedures towards them since they may be of high value, I firmly subscribe to the fact that announcing such
info would not only forge confidence and trust in people
but also
motivate them to be more engaged in the activities or contributions the governments ask them for.Submitted by bita.rezaei7052 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
Consider expanding on the points made, especially the first main argument. Provide more specific details or examples to strengthen your position.
coherence cohesion
Enhance the logical flow by using more transitional phrases, making the connection between ideas even clearer and smoother.
coherence cohesion
The essay has a well-structured introduction and conclusion, which clearly present the main points and summary.
task achievement
The use of specific examples, such as Iranian manufacturers and cosmetic testing, helps to illustrate and support the main points effectively.
task achievement
The essay engages with both perspectives and provides a balanced discussion before presenting a clear personal opinion.