Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in science research, business and academic word. Others believe that some information is too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Whether publicizing scientific, business and academic
information
or findings is beneficial or not has sparked considerable controversy.
While
some assume that sharing
this
information
would interrupt the ongoing
process
, I,
along with
others, believe that it is best to make them as transparent as possible
due to
the reasons
this
essay
further
elaborates on. Proponents of hindering
people
from knowing the latest news regarding science, business or academics, emphasize the safety of
this
valuable
information
. By adopting careful approaches, they ensure only those involved in the
process
are aware of the methodology, materials or resources being used. During cosmetic production,
for instance
, scientists conduct secret experiments on rabbits to make sure the product works efficiently. In many cases, these experiments make rabbits prone to several diseases, intensifying their mortality rate. Despite the community's disagreement on
this
procedure, scientists believe that society's awareness would disrupt the
process
and prevent it from achieving novel insights.
However
,
this
perspective often overlooks the gap
this
situation establishes between
people
and the authorities.
On the other hand
, many countries prioritize proving their trustworthiness to society. By illustrating the
information
they gain in any area,
coupled with
the
process
through which it has been acquired, they bridge the gap between themselves and society but forging trust. Take Iranian manufacturers as an example, they have a fixed weekly schedule for making the production volume known to the public.
In addition
, they declare if the investments are being used in environmentally friendly ways, reducing the industrial carbon footprints.
Such
announcement fosters confidence in
people
and assures them that their tax payments are being utilized in legitimate and eco-friendly processes,
therefore
; they would show more engagement and contribute more to the community and the government.
To conclude
,
while
some advocate for preventing
people
from knowing the
information
and the procedures towards them since they may be of high value, I firmly subscribe to the fact that announcing
such
info would not only forge confidence and trust in
people
but
also
motivate them to be more engaged in the activities or contributions the governments ask them for.
Submitted by bita.rezaei7052 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task achievement
Consider expanding on the points made, especially the first main argument. Provide more specific details or examples to strengthen your position.
coherence cohesion
Enhance the logical flow by using more transitional phrases, making the connection between ideas even clearer and smoother.
coherence cohesion
The essay has a well-structured introduction and conclusion, which clearly present the main points and summary.
task achievement
The use of specific examples, such as Iranian manufacturers and cosmetic testing, helps to illustrate and support the main points effectively.
task achievement
The essay engages with both perspectives and provides a balanced discussion before presenting a clear personal opinion.
What to do next:
Look at other essays: