the table shows data about underghround railway systems in six majhor cities with date opened, kilometres of route and passenger nuymbers per year in millions.

I've reviewed the essay and found several grammatical issues. Here's the corrected structure: The table below depicts **information** about underground tramways in six core cities, consisting of the opening date, distance operated, and the number of users every year. The units are years,

kilometers

Change the spelling

kilometres

show examples

, and millions, respectively.

Overall

, it is evident that

although

opened sooner than Paris and London, Tokyo's underground systems accounted for the largest quantity of passengers. Meanwhile, Kyoto and Los Angeles' formations were operated

last

, which showed mere customers.

Initially

, despite the fact that underground railway systems possessed by the London government opened in 1863 and operated around 394

kilometers

Change the spelling

kilometres

show examples

, attracting only 775

million

users—less than the 416

million

users of Paris, which opened in 1900 and ran 199

kilometers

Change the spelling

kilometres

show examples

. It can be seen that equivalent figures appeared in Tokyo's tramway, which ran 27 years earlier than Paris and operated only 155

kilometers

Change the spelling

kilometres

show examples

, attracting up to 1928

million

customers. Moving onto the remaining statistics, it can be observed that Washington DC's subway, established in 1976 with 45

million

passengers and a 126-kilometer route,

whereas obtaining

Wrong verb form

obtained

show examples

triple the number of customers of Washington formation. Kyoto subway solely ran 11

kilometers

Change the spelling

kilometres

show examples

and opened in 1981.

Finally

, after 20 years when the formation subway of DC ran, the same systems in Los Angeles were established which finished a distance of 28

kilometers

Change the spelling

kilometres

show examples

and accounted for 50

million

users per year.