Us film industry has a more influence on people of the world. It is better that government should invest in local films industry to what extent to you agree or disagree

In recent times, there has been a dominance of American

films

on people all around the world. Some believe that it has a negative impact on society.

However

, it is a pragmatic approach that the government should allocate funds and subsidise local film industries to preserve and flourish native culture and tradition. Modern

films

that are made by American studios cost an exorbitant amount of money and create motion pictures,

Although

the majority of the population enjoys watching movies either in cinema or on television and these kind of

films

impart a feeling of escapism from their daily life. Another important factor is the unreal action and unique scenes which provide a sense of fantasy. People love to be in imaginary worlds.

For example

, Netflix represents innumerable seasons and

films

based on fantasy and fiction. It is

a

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

better way that authorities should invest money in local

films

and

also

help national filmmakers ameliorate local movies and express moral values to the public.

As a result

, increases job opportunities in the country and provides a visual representation of native cultures and traditions. So, it is more convenient for the young generation to practice real values and have a better understanding of the country's history and traditions.

For instance

, the Pakistani media industry makes a majority of dramas or

films

on Islamic views and patriotic sentiments to convey their message to viewers. In conclusion, American

films

are more popular because of their creativity in

films

,

although

films

are not only for entertainment purposes individuals can

also

learn a lot from them. If the government subsidies help local filmmakers to make movies on national culture and traditions, it is a valuable step toward positive change in the film industry.