Some people say that seeing an ancient objects in a museum can give the public a unique awareness of history. Others say that modern media such as internet provide more effective way for the public to learn about history.

Being able to see and interact with ancient stuff links us with

history

more,

while

many feel that reading about it on the

internet

is better because it saves time and gives us more information. The case against using the

Internet

to learn about

history

is that does not give you any physical feeling,

furthermore

, ancient items can give us a closer look at what

history

looked like,

For example

, we wouldn't know the ancient

pyramids

Change noun form

pyramids'

pyramid's

show examples

size if we hadn't interacted with it,

Secondly

, ancient items

such

as swords, armour etc, is hard to describe so it's better to take a look at it in person.

On the other hand

, the

internet

can provide a lot more details about

history

, unlike seeing ancient objects

internet

doesn't have any limits you could read an article about an old war or ancient civilization,

moreover

, you can even see images and videos about the

history

,

this

leads to more specific details and gives us much more knowledge about

history

,

In addition

, the

internet

can be accessed easily. In conclusion,

it is clear that

both opinions have valid points,

However

, I believe that as much as the

internet

has its positives, seeing ancient objects in a physical way is more important

while

learning about

history

.