Rich countries should not employ labor from poor countries because they need the workers more. Do you agree or disagree?
The assertion that rich
nations
should refrain from employing labor
from impoverished Change the spelling
labour
countries
due to
their purportedly greater need oversimplifies the complexities of global labor
dynamics. I firmly contend that Change the spelling
labour
such
a stance fails to consider the multifaceted benefits of labor
mobility and overlooks the ethical imperatives at play.
Primarily, framing the issue solely in terms of the immediate needs of affluent Change the spelling
labour
nations
neglects the fundamental rights and aspirations of individuals
seeking employment opportunities abroad. Labor
migration represents a pathway for Change the spelling
Labour
individuals
from economically disadvantaged regions to improve their livelihoods, support their families, and escape poverty traps. Denying them access to employment opportunities based on the needs of wealthier nations
perpetuates economic inequality and undermines the principles of fairness and justice.
Moreover
, the argument presupposes a static understanding of labor
markets, disregarding their dynamic and interconnected nature. Change the spelling
labour
While
it is true that rich countries
may have labor
shortages in certain sectors, Change the spelling
labour
this
does not preclude the benefits that accrue from the participation of migrant workers. These individuals
bring diverse skills, experiences, and perspectives that enrich the host country's workforce and foster innovation and productivity. Additionally
, the infusion of migrant labor
stimulates economic growth, benefiting both the host country and the global economy at large.
Change the spelling
labour
Furthermore
, the proposition fails to acknowledge the symbiotic relationship between labor-sending
and receiving Change the spelling
labour-sending
countries
. Migrant workers often contribute significantly to their home countries
through remittances, which serve as a lifeline for families and communities, bolstering local economies and alleviating poverty. Thus
, rather than perpetuating dependency, labor
mobility can facilitate development and empower Change the spelling
labour
individuals
to become agents of change in their communities.
In conclusion, the notion that rich countries
should refrain from employing labor
from poor Change the spelling
labour
countries
due to
their purportedly greater need is ethically untenable and shortsighted. Labor
mobility represents a fundamental human right and a catalyst for economic development and social progress. Change the spelling
Labour
Instead
of erecting barriers, affluent nations
should embrace the benefits of diversity and collaboration, fostering inclusive and equitable societies for all.Submitted by [email protected] on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
To enhance the essay, consider providing specific examples or case studies that illustrate the benefits of labor mobility and the positive impact of migrant workers on both their host and home countries.
coherence cohesion
Maintain cohesion by ensuring each paragraph transitions smoothly to the next. Utilize more transitional phrases to guide the reader through your arguments.
task achievement
The essay thoroughly addresses the topic and provides a complete response, considering multiple facets of the argument.
coherence cohesion
The introduction and conclusion are both strong and clearly delineate the essay's main arguments, providing a structured and persuasive overview.
coherence cohesion
Main points are well-supported with logical reasoning, and the essay presents a clear, coherent argument throughout.
Fully explain your ideas
To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).
For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:
- Paragraph 1 - Introduction
- Sentence 1 - Background statement
- Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
- Sentence 3 - Thesis
- Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
- Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
- Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
- Sentence 2 - Example
- Sentence 3 - Discussion
- Sentence 4 - Conclusion
- Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
- Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
- Sentence 2 - Example
- Sentence 3 - Discussion
- Sentence 4 - Conclusion
- Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
- Sentence 1 - Summary
- Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
- Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation
Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.