Many scientific institutes conduct research on live animals. Some people regard it as cruel and unnecessary while others believe it is justified in the interest of human welfare. Discuss the two views and give your reasons. Give reason for your answer.
It is true that a number of scientific agencies do
research
on live animals
. While
it is considered cruel and not important, it has also
various benefits for human beings ' survival and development. The essay will discuss both views and give justification.
Killing animals
or hurting them for analysis and development purposes in medical and science fields has been considered an extremely wrong decision. This
is due to
harm and losses to that generation in the future. By conducting extensive and painful research
programs, the animals
either die or become weak which impacts their future birth rate. As a result
, some species become extinct and their reproduction is also
impacted. For instance
, during a pandemic, many laboratories experiment on rats to investigate for Corona vaccine. Due to
this
, a number of rats died and their growth stopped.
On the other hand
, It is obvious that after conducting so many trials on live animals
, the medicines or vaccines which are developed by agencies have supported human life significantly. This
is because the medical components in pharma industries can not be used directly on mankind considering negative impacts and threats on life. Therefore
, live animals
are assumed to be the best option. Since people's health, lives and welfare are the priorities of any nation, people believe that there is nothing wrong with animals
being used for any testing or clinical experiment. For instance
, as per research
conducted by the University of Japan in the year 2024, more than 50% of medical students have agreed to such
activities.
In conclusion, conducting research
on live animals
is not favourable due to
adverse effects on animals
, nevertheless
, it is a requirement for any country for human health and safety.Submitted by ahv on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
Try integrating more specific examples and evidence to support your arguments, particularly regarding the benefits of animal testing. For instance, mentioning specific breakthroughs in medical research where animal testing played a crucial role would help strengthen your points.
coherence cohesion
Ensure seamless connections between ideas by making use of linking words and phrases. Phrases like "despite this," or "on the other hand," can significantly enhance the flow of your arguments.
task achievement
The essay successfully discusses both sides of the argument, presenting a balanced view on a controversial topic.
coherence cohesion
Clear introduction and conclusion that effectively set the stage and wrap up the essay.
Your opinion
Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.
If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.
Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.
Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:
...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?