It is not neccessary to travel to other places to learn the culture of other people. We can just learn much from books, films and the internet . Do you agree or disagree ?

This

is a topic of arguement that some

people

belive that learning

culture

of different society can be only mastered through Movies, books and internet

while

others think that it can be learned through travelling various countries. i belive that travelling and being physically present within the

people

of that particular

culture

could potentially makes it easier to learn the values and understand the

culture

in more deeper sense. reading various books on societies and regional philosophy could give a greater sense of understanding,

People

's way of thinking and how the society have grown over the period of time.

Similarly

with Television and internet could imrpove a persons language ability and Through social media we could adapt certain knowledge but

for example

: It's extremly difficult to Carry yourself and Act in a same way a particular individual follows from a

culture

. Several

people

travels from Countries to Countries have a greater understanding of one's

culture

becasue those individual have experienced and learned other

people

's

culture

by being physically present.

on the other hand

. Migration plays an important role for mirgrants because by carrying day to day activity in other's sector's or society could chnage an individual. Eg:

According to

international AU firm's servey, 86% of

People

immigrating to Australia have shown significant changes in Migrants adapting the

culture

in positive way within half a decade. In conlusion, I disgree with the above statement that

culture

can be learned through books, Cinema and Internet only. In order to have deeper sense of learning, One Must explore other parts of the world where there is lack of electronic connectivity, insufficient written knowledge and movies which are not been produced yet.