Water is a natural resources that should be free. Government should ban the sale of bottled water. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Water
reservoirs and rain are natural resources, which serve indispensable demands for human life, so access
to freshwater should be free for everyone. However
, I disagree with prohibiting commercial bottled beverages.
There are some persuasive stances against prohibiting commercial drinks. Bottled water
offers convenience and choice for consumers in places where tap water
quality is questionable or where entry to clean drinking water
is limited. Additionally
, bottled water
is perceived as being safer and of higher quality, so these products can serve as a crucial alternative in some situations, such
as in semi-arid locations or in drought periods. For example
, there are many patients hospitalized with digestive ailments after drinking water
pollution, including cholera, diarrhoea and dysentery.
On the other hand
, there are some convincing arguments for banning commercial plastic bottles. In particular
, the production and transportation of bottled water
require substantial energy, contributing to carbon emissions, while
plastic bottles exacerbate environmental degradation due to
improper littering from customers and the performance of recycling practices is negligible. Hence
, banning bottled water
could reduce plastic waste and its harmful effects on ecosystems. Consequently
, banning bottled water
could promote the use of reusable water
containers, encouraging more sustainable practices and reducing the overall
demand for single-use plastics. Moreover
, water
is essential for human survival, and access
to clean water
should be considered a basic human right. Making it freely available ensures that everyone, regardless of their financial status, has access
to this
vital resource. For instance
, if local councils provide the stability and quality of water
resources, it will increase the living standards and conditions of their citizens.
To conclude
, despite there are strong arguments for both the benefits and drawbacks of banning bottled water
, a more balanced approach might be more effective. Rather than an outright ban, efforts could be directed towards improving public water
infrastructure and encouraging the use of reusable containers, these address the environmental issues associated with bottled water
production and disposal. This
approach would allow for both the protection of the environment and the practical needs of individuals in areas with limited access
to clean water
.Submitted by lenam2k1 on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
coherence cohesion
Introduce each paragraph with a clear topic sentence. This will help guide the reader and enhance the logical flow of your essay.
task achievement
Provide more specific examples or statistical data to support your arguments. This will strengthen the persuasiveness of your essay.
task achievement
The essay provides a thorough examination of both sides of the argument, offering a balanced perspective.
coherence cohesion
There is a clear and logical structure to the essay, with an introduction, body paragraphs, and conclusion neatly presented.
task achievement
Main points are adequately supported with relevant explanations and examples, contributing to a comprehensive response to the prompt.