Governments should ban dangerous sports. Others think that people should have the freedom to do any sport activity. Discuss both side and give your opinion

Governments are playing a big part in many sections of a nation. One of them is about sport.

While

there is a statement saying that Governments should ban extreme

sports

, I side with those who feel that folks should not restricted from playing any

sports

activity. On the one hand, it could argued that

humans

should not do dangerous

sports

because it can cause two negative effects.

Firstly

, when they are doing extreme

sports

, it can enhance the risk of getting injured. When individuals are playing a road race ,

for example

, the chance of a crash accident increases as they drive their motorcycle at high speed.

Secondly

, some of the extreme

sports

do not have a

number

of certificate instructors.

Consequently

, people who do those

sports

hardly do that in the correct way.

On the other hand

, I believe that those who think that

humans

should have the freedom to do any

sports

activity for two main reasons.

To begin

with, if people do a dangerous sport, it can increase the

number

of adrenaline in their bodies. Because the

number

of adrenaline is up, individuals will earn some happiness than doing a usual game.

For instance

, after playing mixed martial arts, the stress level of individuals will decrease as they can unwind by punching the board when they play that game.

Then

, some extreme

sports

can make the connection between

humans

and nature as many of them are outdoor activities. To explain

this

, when folks do paragliding, they can feel fresh air.

Furthermore

, they can look up the town from the sky. In conclusion,

while

most extreme

sports

can cause

humans

to get injured, they can increase the

number

of adrenaline in people's bodies.

Therefore

, on balance, I remain firmly convinced that the idea of banning extreme

sports

should be abolished.